[PATCH 2/2] nvmem: qfprom: Improve the comment about regulator setting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In review feedback Joe Perches found the existing comment
confusing. Let's use something based on the wording proposed by Joe.

Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
index 1ba666bcb900..81fbad5e939d 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
@@ -196,9 +196,9 @@ static int qfprom_enable_fuse_blowing(const struct qfprom_priv *priv,
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * Hardware requires a min voltage for fuse blowing; this may be
-	 * a rail shared do don't specify a max--regulator constraints
-	 * will handle.
+	 * Hardware requires a minimum voltage for fuse blowing.
+	 * This may be a shared rail so don't specify a maximum.
+	 * Regulator constraints will cap to the actual maximum.
 	 */
 	ret = regulator_set_voltage(priv->vcc, qfprom_blow_uV, INT_MAX);
 	if (ret) {
-- 
2.31.1.818.g46aad6cb9e-goog




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux