Hi,
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 05:01:50PM +0200, Bartosz Dudziak wrote:
> Add APQ8026 and MSM8226 SoCs register data to SPM AVS Wrapper 2 (SAW2)
> power controller driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Dudziak <bartosz.dudziak@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c
> index adf91a6e4d..9711a98d68 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c
> @@ -87,6 +87,18 @@ static const struct spm_reg_data spm_reg_8974_8084_cpu = {
> .start_index[PM_SLEEP_MODE_SPC] = 3,
> };
>
> +/* SPM register data for 8026, 8226 */
> +static const struct spm_reg_data spm_reg_8x26_cpu = {
> + .reg_offset = spm_reg_offset_v2_1,
> + .spm_cfg = 0x0,
> + .spm_dly = 0x3C102800,
> + .seq = { 0x60, 0x03, 0x60, 0x0B, 0x0F, 0x20, 0x10, 0x80, 0x30, 0x90,
> + 0x5B, 0x60, 0x03, 0x60, 0x3B, 0x76, 0x76, 0x0B, 0x94, 0x5B,
> + 0x80, 0x10, 0x26, 0x30, 0x0F },
> + .start_index[PM_SLEEP_MODE_STBY] = 0,
> + .start_index[PM_SLEEP_MODE_SPC] = 5,
> +};
> +
> static const u8 spm_reg_offset_v1_1[SPM_REG_NR] = {
> [SPM_REG_CFG] = 0x08,
> [SPM_REG_SPM_CTL] = 0x20,
> @@ -259,6 +271,10 @@ static struct spm_driver_data *spm_get_drv(struct platform_device *pdev,
> }
>
> static const struct of_device_id spm_match_table[] = {
> + { .compatible = "qcom,apq8026-saw2-v2.1-cpu",
> + .data = &spm_reg_8x26_cpu },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,msm8226-saw2-v2.1-cpu",
> + .data = &spm_reg_8x26_cpu },
What is the reason for having a separate compatible for APQ8026?
If the difference between MSM8226 and APQ8026 is similar to other qcom
SoCs (just lack of modem), both will end up using the same device tree
include anyway. Then it's easier to have both use qcom,msm8226-saw2-v2.1-cpu.
Thanks,
Stephan
