Re: [PATCH v7 2/5] usb: dwc3: core: Host wake up support from system suspend

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Sandeep Maheswaram <sanm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> Sandeep Maheswaram <sanm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> Avoiding phy powerdown when wakeup capable devices are connected
>>> by checking phy_power_off flag.
>>> Phy should be on to wake up the device from suspend using wakeup capable
>>> devices such as keyboard and mouse.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sandeep Maheswaram <sanm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 7 +++++--
>>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
>>> index b6e53d8..bb414c3 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
>>> @@ -1738,7 +1738,7 @@ static int dwc3_suspend_common(struct dwc3 *dwc, pm_message_t msg)
>>>   		dwc3_core_exit(dwc);
>>>   		break;
>>>   	case DWC3_GCTL_PRTCAP_HOST:
>>> -		if (!PMSG_IS_AUTO(msg)) {
>>> +		if (!PMSG_IS_AUTO(msg) && dwc->phy_power_off) {
>> should be able to detect this generically, no? Shouldn't
>> device_may_wakeup() be valid here and give you the answer you want?
>
> I think  device_may_wakeup() gives whether the controller is wake up 
> capable or not.

Yes, but it's a bit more than that. Looking at devices.rst we read:

If :c:func:`device_may_wakeup(dev)` returns ``true``, the device should be
prepared for generating hardware wakeup signals to trigger a system wakeup event
when the system is in the sleep state.  For example, :c:func:`enable_irq_wake()`
might identify GPIO signals hooked up to a switch or other external hardware,
and :c:func:`pci_enable_wake()` does something similar for the PCI PME signal.

So, if there is a condition where $this device has to, somehow, deal
with wakeup, it should be configured accordingly. This ->phy_power_off
flag is telling us the same thing.

> But we want to keep phy powered on only when some wakeup capable devices 
> (eg:keyboard ,mouse ) are connected to controller.

Understood, it could be that we're missing some method for propagating
that state (i.e. keyboard with PM support) up to the parent device, but
that's no excuse to bypass driver boundaries. Wouldn't you agree?

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux