Re: [PATCH v21 1/2] scsi: ufs: Enable power management for wlun

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24/04/21 3:20 am, Asutosh Das wrote:
> During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are
> already suspended and so are the queues associated with them.
> But the ufs host sends SSU (START_STOP_UNIT) to wlun
> during its runtime-suspend.
> During the process blk_queue_enter checks if the queue is not in
> suspended state. If so, it waits for the queue to resume, and never
> comes out of it.
> The commit
> (d55d15a33: scsi: block: Do not accept any requests while suspended)
> adds the check if the queue is in suspended state in blk_queue_enter().
> 
> Call trace:
>  __switch_to+0x174/0x2c4
>  __schedule+0x478/0x764
>  schedule+0x9c/0xe0
>  blk_queue_enter+0x158/0x228
>  blk_mq_alloc_request+0x40/0xa4
>  blk_get_request+0x2c/0x70
>  __scsi_execute+0x60/0x1c4
>  ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode+0x124/0x1e4
>  ufshcd_suspend+0x208/0x83c
>  ufshcd_runtime_suspend+0x40/0x154
>  ufshcd_pltfrm_runtime_suspend+0x14/0x20
>  pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x28/0x3c
>  __rpm_callback+0x80/0x2a4
>  rpm_suspend+0x308/0x614
>  rpm_idle+0x158/0x228
>  pm_runtime_work+0x84/0xac
>  process_one_work+0x1f0/0x470
>  worker_thread+0x26c/0x4c8
>  kthread+0x13c/0x320
>  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
> 
> Fix this by registering ufs device wlun as a scsi driver and
> registering it for block runtime-pm. Also make this as a
> supplier for all other luns. That way, this device wlun
> suspends after all the consumers and resumes after
> hba resumes. This also registers a new scsi driver for rpmb wlun.
> This new driver is mostly used to clear rpmb uac.
> 
> Fixed smatch warnings:
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Co-developed-by: Can Guo <cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Note we don't use regulators, clocks, clock scaling or gating.
Although those things do look OK.
Notwithstanding that:

Reviewed-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux