Re: [GIT PULL] Qualcomm ARM64 DT updates for 5.13

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu 08 Apr 10:24 CDT 2021, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 11:49:14 -0500, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > The following changes since commit a38fd8748464831584a19438cbb3082b5a2dab15:
> > 
> >   Linux 5.12-rc2 (2021-03-05 17:33:41 -0800)
> > 
> > are available in the Git repository at:
> > 
> >   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/qcom/linux.git tags/qcom-arm64-for-5.13
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> I noticed a couple of new warnings from 'make dtbs_check W=1':
> 
> qcom/sc7180.dtsi:1204.21-1220.6: Warning (avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /soc@0/geniqup@ac0000/i2c@a8c000: unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges" or child "reg" property
> qcom/sc7180.dtsi:965.21-981.6: Warning (avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /soc@0/geniqup@8c0000/i2c@890000: unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges" or child "reg" property qcom/sdm845.dtsi:3912.23-4045.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc@0/camss@a00000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "acb3000"
> qcom/sdm845.dtsi:4041.10-4044.6: Warning (graph_child_address): /soc@0/camss@a00000/ports: graph node has single child node 'port@0', #address-cells/#size-cells are not necessary
> qcom/sdm845.dtsi:4102.32-4129.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc@0/dsi-opp-table: missing or empty reg/ranges property
> qcom/msm8916-samsung-a5u-eur.dt.yaml: spmi@200f000: reg: [[33615872, 4096], [37748736, 4194304], [46137344, 4194304], [58720256, 2097152], [33595392, 8448]] is too long
> qcom/sc7180-trogdor-lazor-r0.dt.yaml: gmu@506a000: compatible:0: 'qcom,adreno-gmu-618.0' is not one of ['qcom,adreno-gmu-630.2']
> qcom/sc7180-trogdor-lazor-r1-kb.dt.yaml: memory@80900000: 'device_type' is a required property
> qcom/sdm850-lenovo-yoga-c630.dt.yaml: memory@97b00000: 'device_type' is a required property
> 

I saw your other email regarding these and per Rob's request we've
ramped up our effort on cleaning these out. I've however still not
figured out a good way to incorporate the dtbs_check in my patch
handling workflow.

> Maybe see if you can address these in a follow-up, to avoid regressions.
> 

I'm about to send you a another set of pull requests with some more
goodies that was lingering on the list. I will take a look to see if I
can follow up on that with some fixes for above warnings - and take
another look at incorporating dtbs_check in my workflow.

> Merged into arm/dt, thanks!
> 

Thank you!
Bjorn

> merge commit: 61bac46eed14ad73cd41c5b7075350fef78ca4be
> 
>        Arnd



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux