On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 at 22:57, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2021-03-27 01:13:56) > > Hi Tanya, > > > > On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 at 04:49, Taniya Das <tdas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Dmitry, > > > > > > Thanks for the patch for cleanup. > > > It is okay to remove TEST source, but you can still keep the sleep clock > > > source as it could be still connected to certain RCGs and could be used > > > to derive low frequencies if required. > > > > > > As these sources are generated from the HW plans it would be good if we > > > keep them as they are except the TEST source. > > > > Please note that I've barely removed the unused enum entry, which is > > not used in any of clock parent maps. So I'd suggest to either add it > > to relevant clock parent maps and to the videocc bindings or to drop > > unused enum entry. > > > > Is this going to be resent? Is there a reason to resend the patches? I'm not removing any actual clock sources, only unused(!) enum entries are removed. No functional changes. -- With best wishes Dmitry
