Hi Bhaumik,
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 00:31, Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Introduce helper function to allow MHI core driver to poll for
> a value in a register field. This helps reach a common path to
> read and poll register values along with a retry time interval.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/bus/mhi/core/internal.h | 3 +++
> drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/internal.h b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/internal.h
> index 6f80ec3..005286b 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/internal.h
> @@ -643,6 +643,9 @@ int __must_check mhi_read_reg(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
> int __must_check mhi_read_reg_field(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
> void __iomem *base, u32 offset, u32 mask,
> u32 shift, u32 *out);
> +int __must_check mhi_poll_reg_field(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
> + void __iomem *base, u32 offset, u32 mask,
> + u32 shift, u32 val, u32 delayus);
> void mhi_write_reg(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl, void __iomem *base,
> u32 offset, u32 val);
> void mhi_write_reg_field(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl, void __iomem *base,
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c
> index 4e0131b..7c7f41a 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> *
> */
>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/dma-direction.h>
> #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> @@ -37,6 +38,28 @@ int __must_check mhi_read_reg_field(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +int __must_check mhi_poll_reg_field(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
> + void __iomem *base, u32 offset,
> + u32 mask, u32 shift, u32 val, u32 delayus)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + u32 out, retry = (mhi_cntrl->timeout_ms * 1000) / delayus;
> +
> + while (retry--) {
> + ret = mhi_read_reg_field(mhi_cntrl, base, offset, mask, shift,
> + &out);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (out == val)
> + return 0;
> +
> + udelay(delayus);
Have you read my previous comment?
Do you really want to risk hogging the CPU for several seconds? we
know that some devices take several seconds to start/boot.
Why not using msleep variant here?
Regards,
Loic
