On 2021-03-05 12:23, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting mkrishn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (2021-03-04 04:36:05)
On 2021-02-27 01:15, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Krishna Manikandan (2021-02-12 02:49:57)
>> +
>> + soc {
>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>
> I think we can drop the soc node from the examples.
Hi Stephen,
In latest dt schema, there is a rule that we have to specify the
address
and size cells or else it will take default value of 1 for both. If we
use these default values, dt binding check will throw error as display
uses 2 address cells and 2 size cells. That's why soc node was added
to
specify the values for mdss node.
Do you need to use both cells in the example? Presumably the second
cell
is all zero, so it's useless. The example doesn't have to have both
cells in the reg property, that can be fixed up when writing the DT for
a particular SoC.
Sure Stephen. I will make the changes in the next patchset.
Thanks,
Krishna
