Re: [PATCH V2] cpufreq: Remove CPUFREQ_STICKY flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This patch was applied to qcom/linux.git (refs/heads/for-next):

On Tue,  2 Feb 2021 10:25:11 +0530 you wrote:
> During cpufreq driver's registration, if the ->init() callback for all
> the CPUs fail then there is not much point in keeping the driver around
> as it will only account for more of unnecessary noise, for example
> cpufreq core will try to suspend/resume the driver which never got
> registered properly.
> 
> The removal of such a driver is avoided if the driver carries the
> CPUFREQ_STICKY flag. This was added way back [1] in 2004 and perhaps no
> one should ever need it now. A lot of drivers do set this flag, probably
> because they just copied it from other drivers.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [V2] cpufreq: Remove CPUFREQ_STICKY flag
    https://git.kernel.org/qcom/c/5ae4a4b45d43

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux