On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 at 19:25, Jonathan Marek <jonathan@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The driver already has support for sm8150/sm8250, but the compatibles were
> never added.
>
> Also inverse the non-mdp4 condition in add_display_components() to avoid
> having to check every new compatible in the condition.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dpu.txt | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c | 6 +++---
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dpu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dpu.txt
> index 551ae26f60da..5763f43200a0 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dpu.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dpu.txt
> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ The DPU display controller is found in SDM845 SoC.
>
> MDSS:
> Required properties:
> -- compatible: "qcom,sdm845-mdss", "qcom,sc7180-mdss"
> +- compatible: "qcom,sdm845-mdss", "qcom,sc7180-mdss", "qcom,sm8150-mdss", "qcom,sm8250-mdss"
> - reg: physical base address and length of contoller's registers.
> - reg-names: register region names. The following region is required:
> * "mdss"
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Optional properties:
>
> MDP:
> Required properties:
> -- compatible: "qcom,sdm845-dpu", "qcom,sc7180-dpu"
> +- compatible: "qcom,sdm845-dpu", "qcom,sc7180-dpu", "qcom,sm8150-dpu", "qcom,sm8250-dpu"
> - reg: physical base address and length of controller's registers.
> - reg-names : register region names. The following region is required:
> * "mdp"
These two chunks should probably go to the separate patch 'dt-bindings:...'.
Also, could you please pinpoint the reason for adding more
compatibility strings, while they map to the same internal data?
I think we might want instead to use some generic name for the dpu
block, like "qcom,dpu" or "qcom,mdp-dpu" instead of specifying the
platform name.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
> index 5a8e3e1fc48c..fff12a4c8bfc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
> @@ -1219,6 +1219,8 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops dpu_pm_ops = {
> static const struct of_device_id dpu_dt_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-dpu", },
> { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-dpu", },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,sm8150-dpu", },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-dpu", },
> {}
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, dpu_dt_match);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
> index 94525ac76d4e..928f13d4bfbc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
> @@ -1185,9 +1185,7 @@ static int add_display_components(struct device *dev,
> * Populate the children devices, find the MDP5/DPU node, and then add
> * the interfaces to our components list.
> */
> - if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,mdss") ||
> - of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,sdm845-mdss") ||
> - of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,sc7180-mdss")) {
> + if (!of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,mdp4")) {
> ret = of_platform_populate(dev->of_node, NULL, NULL, dev);
> if (ret) {
> DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "failed to populate children devices\n");
> @@ -1320,6 +1318,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id dt_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "qcom,mdss", .data = (void *)KMS_MDP5 },
> { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-mdss", .data = (void *)KMS_DPU },
> { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-mdss", .data = (void *)KMS_DPU },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,sm8150-mdss", .data = (void *)KMS_DPU },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-mdss", .data = (void *)KMS_DPU },
> {}
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, dt_match);
> --
> 2.26.1
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
