Hi
On 08.02.2021 21:04, Jonathan Marek wrote:
> dma_map_sgtable() returns 0 on success, which is the opposite of what this
> code was doing.
>
> Fixes: 7cd7edb89437 ("misc: fastrpc: fix common struct sg_table related issues")
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@xxxxxxxx>
Right, I'm really sorry for this regression.
Acked-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> index 70eb5ed942d0..f12e909034ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> @@ -520,12 +520,13 @@ fastrpc_map_dma_buf(struct dma_buf_attachment *attachment,
> {
> struct fastrpc_dma_buf_attachment *a = attachment->priv;
> struct sg_table *table;
> + int ret;
>
> table = &a->sgt;
>
> - if (!dma_map_sgtable(attachment->dev, table, dir, 0))
> - return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> -
> + ret = dma_map_sgtable(attachment->dev, table, dir, 0);
> + if (ret)
> + table = ERR_PTR(ret);
> return table;
> }
>
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
