Quoting Konrad Dybcio (2021-01-18 08:14:41)
> This was omitted when first adding the clocks for these SoCs.
>
I believe they were omitted because the system crashed if they were
touched. Is that still the case?
> Fixes: b4297844995 ("clk: qcom: smd: Add support for MSM8992/4 rpm clocks")
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.h | 2 ++
> include/linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
> index 0e1dfa89489e..91d610042a5d 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
> @@ -624,6 +624,8 @@ static const struct rpm_smd_clk_desc rpm_clk_msm8976 = {
> };
>
> /* msm8992 */
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_BRANCH(msm8992, bi_tcxo, bi_tcxo_a, QCOM_SMD_RPM_MISC_CLK, 0,
> + 19200000);
This rate should come from some parent clk specified in the board DTS
file as a fixed rate clock.
> DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(msm8992, pnoc_clk, pnoc_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 0);
> DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(msm8992, ocmemgx_clk, ocmemgx_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_MEM_CLK, 2);
> DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(msm8992, bimc_clk, bimc_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_MEM_CLK, 0);
