Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: Define common TLMM binding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu 21 Jan 07:20 CST 2021, Linus Walleij wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:21 PM Bjorn Andersson
> <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Several properties are shared between all TLMM bindings. By providing a
> > common binding to define these properties each platform's binding can be
> > reduced to just listing which of these properties should be checked for
> > - or further specified.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Overall it looks good, just cutting some slack for reviewers (especially
> DT people) before applying.
> 
> > +description:
> > +  This defines the common properties used to describe all Qualcomm TLMM
> > +  bindings and pinconf/pinmux states for these.
> 
> I vaguely recall asking you in the past what the acronym TLMM actually
> means. This would be a good place to expand the acronym so people
> know what these four letters actually represent.
> 

As Vinod said, it's used in a few places and I agree that we should
spell it out here.

In particular I had to include "phandle" in the list of valid properties
for for the dtbs_check to pass when there are references to state nodes,
so I would like to hear from Rob about that.

Will respin this after getting his input - hopefully with his Ack ;)

> (There, I finally gave you an official reason to go and poke Qualcomm
> hardware engineers about this. ;)
> 

:)

Regards,
Bjorn



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux