The PLL_LOCKDET_RATE_1 was being programmed with a hardcoded value directly, but the same value was also being specified in the dsi_pll_regs struct pll_lockdet_rate variable: let's use it! Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/pll/dsi_pll_10nm.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/pll/dsi_pll_10nm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/pll/dsi_pll_10nm.c index 5be562dfbf06..df3e4584dfd7 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/pll/dsi_pll_10nm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/pll/dsi_pll_10nm.c @@ -302,7 +302,8 @@ static void dsi_pll_commit(struct dsi_pll_10nm *pll) reg->frac_div_start_mid); pll_write(base + REG_DSI_10nm_PHY_PLL_FRAC_DIV_START_HIGH_1, reg->frac_div_start_high); - pll_write(base + REG_DSI_10nm_PHY_PLL_PLL_LOCKDET_RATE_1, 0x40); + pll_write(base + REG_DSI_10nm_PHY_PLL_PLL_LOCKDET_RATE_1, + reg->pll_lockdet_rate); pll_write(base + REG_DSI_10nm_PHY_PLL_PLL_LOCK_DELAY, 0x06); pll_write(base + REG_DSI_10nm_PHY_PLL_CMODE, 0x10); pll_write(base + REG_DSI_10nm_PHY_PLL_CLOCK_INVERTERS, -- 2.29.2
