On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 21:46, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 10:56:42AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 19:54, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 11:40:03AM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > This patchset adds support for eMMC inline encryption, as specified by > > > > the upcoming version of the eMMC specification and as already > > > > implemented and used on many devices. Building on that, it then adds > > > > Qualcomm ICE support and wires it up for the Snapdragon 630 SoC. > > > > > > > > Inline encryption hardware improves the performance of storage > > > > encryption and reduces power usage. See > > > > Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst for more information about > > > > inline encryption and the blk-crypto framework (upstreamed in v5.8) > > > > which supports it. Most mobile devices already use UFS or eMMC inline > > > > encryption hardware; UFS support was already upstreamed in v5.9. > > > > > > > > Patches 1-3 add support for the standard eMMC inline encryption. > > > > > > > > However, as with UFS, host controller-specific patches are needed on top > > > > of the standard support. Therefore, patches 4-8 add Qualcomm ICE > > > > (Inline Crypto Engine) support and wire it up on the Snapdragon 630 SoC. > > > > > > > > To test this I took advantage of the recently upstreamed support for the > > > > Snapdragon 630 SoC, plus work-in-progress patches from the SoMainline > > > > project (https://github.com/SoMainline/linux/tree/konrad/v5.10-rc3). In > > > > particular, I was able to run the fscrypt xfstests for ext4 and f2fs in > > > > a Debian chroot. Among other things, these tests verified that the > > > > correct ciphertext is written to disk (the same as software encryption). > > > > > > > > It will also be possible to add support for Mediatek eMMC inline > > > > encryption hardware in mtk-sd, and it should be easier than the Qualcomm > > > > hardware since the Mediatek hardware follows the standard more closely. > > > > I.e., patches 1-3 should be almost enough for the Mediatek hardware. > > > > However, I don't have the hardware to do this yet. > > > > > > > > This patchset is based on v5.10-rc3, and it can also be retrieved from > > > > tag "mmc-crypto-v1" of > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiggers/linux.git > > > > > > > > Note: the fscrypt inline encryption support is partially broken in > > > > v5.10-rc3, so for testing a fscrypt fix needs to be applied too: > > > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201111015224.303073-1-ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > Eric Biggers (8): > > > > mmc: add basic support for inline encryption > > > > mmc: cqhci: rename cqhci.c to cqhci-core.c > > > > mmc: cqhci: add support for inline encryption > > > > mmc: cqhci: add cqhci_host_ops::program_key > > > > firmware: qcom_scm: update comment for ICE-related functions > > > > dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-msm: add ICE registers and clock > > > > arm64: dts: qcom: sdm630: add ICE registers and clocks > > > > mmc: sdhci-msm: add Inline Crypto Engine support > > > > > > Any comments on this patchset? > > > > I have been busy, but just wanted to let you know that I am moving to > > start reviewing this series shortly. > > > > I also need to catch up on the eMMC spec a bit, before I can provide > > you with comments. > > > > Kind regards > > Uffe > > Ulf, are you still planning to review this patchset? I just sent out v4 of this > patchset based on v5.11-rc2, but not a lot has changed from previous versions, > since people have generally seemed happy with it. Any chance that you will > apply it for 5.12? Thanks! My apologies for the delay. I certainly appreciate the review that's been done by people and I intend to have a look myself within the coming week. I definitely think it should be possible to get this queued for v5.12, unless I find some very weird things, which I doubt. Kind regards Uffe
