On 12/7/20 5:09 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 10:52:33AM -0500, Thara Gopinath wrote:
Add compatible string to support v5.4 crypto engine.
Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom-qce.txt | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom-qce.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom-qce.txt
index fdd53b184ba8..ed1ede9c0acc 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom-qce.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom-qce.txt
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@ Qualcomm crypto engine driver
Required properties:
-- compatible : should be "qcom,crypto-v5.1"
+- compatible : should be
+ "qcom,crypto-v5.1" for ipq6018
+ "qcom,crypto-v5.4" for sdm845
An outstanding example of why to use SoC specific compatibles rather
than versions. Keep v5.1, but use SoC compatibles going forward.
Hi Rob,
Thanks for the review. We have different Soc's using the same version of
the ip. Is it okay to have "qcom,sdm845-crypto", "qcom,crypto-v5.4" amd
have only "qcom,crypto-<version>" in the driver ?
- reg : specifies base physical address and size of the registers map
- clocks : phandle to clock-controller plus clock-specifier pair
- clock-names : "iface" clocks register interface
--
2.25.1
--
Warm Regards
Thara