On 11-12-20, 15:10, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Krishna Manikandan (2020-12-10 23:09:44) > > .../bindings/display/msm/dpu-sc7180.yaml | 235 +++++++++++++++++++ > > .../bindings/display/msm/dpu-sdm845.yaml | 216 ++++++++++++++++++ > > .../devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dpu.txt | 141 ------------ > > .../display/msm/dsi-common-controller.yaml | 235 +++++++++++++++++++ > > .../bindings/display/msm/dsi-controller-main.yaml | 119 ++++++++++ > > .../bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-10nm.yaml | 64 ++++++ > > .../bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml | 64 ++++++ > > .../bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-20nm.yaml | 68 ++++++ > > .../bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-28nm.yaml | 64 ++++++ > > .../devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy.yaml | 81 +++++++ > > .../devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi.txt | 249 --------------------- > > 11 files changed, 1146 insertions(+), 390 deletions(-) > > This is quite a bit to review. Any chance to split it up into different > patches? Looks like that could be: dpu, phy, and dsi to make this a bit > more reviewable. Yes that would certainly be very helpful for review. Also I noticed that phy binding seem quite similar with few additions, can we add a single binding document which documents .. or maybe check with Rob.. what is the guidance, single doc or multiple..? -- ~Vinod
