Hi Mani,
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 02:24, Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sat, 28 Nov 2020 at 06:49, Manivannan Sadhasivam
> > <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> > {
> >> > @@ -298,16 +323,20 @@ static int mhi_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> >> > {
> >> > const struct mhi_pci_dev_info *info = (struct mhi_pci_dev_info *) id->driver_data;
> >> > const struct mhi_controller_config *mhi_cntrl_config;
> >> > + struct mhi_pci_device *mhi_pdev;
> >> > struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl;
> >> > int err;
> >> >
> >> > dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "MHI PCI device found: %s\n", info->name);
> >> >
> >> > - mhi_cntrl = mhi_alloc_controller();
> >> > - if (!mhi_cntrl)
> >> > + mhi_pdev = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*mhi_pdev), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> > + if (!mhi_pdev)
> >> > return -ENOMEM;
> >>
> >> Still not agreeing to use the alloc API? I know that it does only one
> >> job but the reason for pushing this API is that the MHI stack will
> >> misbehave terribly if a non-initialized structure is passed to it. And
> >> the only way to ensure is to provide an API and recommend the users to
> >> use it.
> >
> > I think there is a misunderstanding of my will here :-), actually, I'm
> > not against using a specific API, but as you see here I'm not
> > allocating a mhi_controller structure but a mhi_pci_device structure,
> > which in turn includes (or inherit from) mhi_controller struct.
> >
> > If mhi_alloc_controller() is the only API allowing to
> > create+initialize a mhi_controller object, that implies:
> > a. Statically allocated mhi_controller is not possible
> > b. non-standalone mhi_controller structure is not possible (my case)
> >
> > If you mandate this and do not allow a. and b. , then yes, I'll use
> > mhi_controller_alloc, but that would mean having two nested dynamic
> > allocations, one for mhi_pdev and one for mhi_pdev->mhi_cntrl,
> > cross-referencing (for finding mhi_pdev from mhi_cntrl since no more
> > container_of), and double freeing... that complicates a bit, is
> > suboptimal and does not really make sense, since conceptually,
> > mhi_pdev and its mhi_cntl member are the same 'object' (exactly like
> > mhi_dev and mhi_dev->dev are the same object in MHI core).
> >
> > I understand we may have to perform some extra initialization and
> > cannot just do zeroed allocation for the mhi_controller, but what I
> > say is that this initialization should be do-able, regardless you want
> > to (also) dynamically allocate the device or not. That why I proposed
> > to introduce mhi_initialize_controller() as a solution to keep things
> > simple, in the same way as other subsystems: device_initialize,
> > snd_device_initialize, nand_controller_init...
> >
> > Regards,
> > Loic
> >
> >
> I don't see using the new API as a problem but it is more work for the
> controller and having one API is better than having two and having to
> explain
> why we have them.
Before going with V4, I would like your feedback here.
Thanks,
Loic
>
> If Mani agrees with this approach I am OK with it.
> >>
> >> >
> >> > mhi_cntrl_config = info->config;
> >> > + mhi_cntrl = &mhi_pdev->mhi_cntrl;
> >> > +
> >> > + mhi_initialize_controller(mhi_cntrl);
> >>
> >> No, please just stick to alloc API.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Mani
> >>
> >> > mhi_cntrl->cntrl_dev = &pdev->dev;
> >> > mhi_cntrl->iova_start = 0;
> >> > mhi_cntrl->iova_stop = (dma_addr_t)DMA_BIT_MASK(info->dma_data_width);
> >> > @@ -322,17 +351,21 @@ static int mhi_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> >> >
> >> > err = mhi_pci_claim(mhi_cntrl, info->bar_num, DMA_BIT_MASK(info->dma_data_width));
> >> > if (err)
> >> > - goto err_release;
> >> > + return err;
> >> >
> >> > err = mhi_pci_get_irqs(mhi_cntrl, mhi_cntrl_config);
> >> > if (err)
> >> > - goto err_release;
> >> > + return err;
> >> > +
> >> > + pci_set_drvdata(pdev, mhi_pdev);
> >> >
> >> > - pci_set_drvdata(pdev, mhi_cntrl);
> >> > + /* Have stored pci confspace at hand for restore in sudden PCI error */
> >> > + pci_save_state(pdev);
> >> > + mhi_pdev->pci_state = pci_store_saved_state(pdev);
> >> >
> >> > err = mhi_register_controller(mhi_cntrl, mhi_cntrl_config);
> >> > if (err)
> >> > - goto err_release;
> >> > + return err;
> >> >
> >> > /* MHI bus does not power up the controller by default */
> >> > err = mhi_prepare_for_power_up(mhi_cntrl);
> >> > @@ -347,37 +380,97 @@ static int mhi_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> >> > goto err_unprepare;
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > + set_bit(MHI_PCI_DEV_STARTED, &mhi_pdev->status);
> >> > +
> >> > return 0;
> >> >
> >> > err_unprepare:
> >> > mhi_unprepare_after_power_down(mhi_cntrl);
> >> > err_unregister:
> >> > mhi_unregister_controller(mhi_cntrl);
> >> > -err_release:
> >> > - mhi_free_controller(mhi_cntrl);
> >> >
> >> > return err;
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > static void mhi_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >> > {
> >> > - struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >> > + struct mhi_pci_device *mhi_pdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >> > + struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl = &mhi_pdev->mhi_cntrl;
> >> > +
> >> > + if (test_and_clear_bit(MHI_PCI_DEV_STARTED, &mhi_pdev->status)) {
> >> > + mhi_power_down(mhi_cntrl, true);
> >> > + mhi_unprepare_after_power_down(mhi_cntrl);
> >> > + }
> >> >
> >> > - mhi_power_down(mhi_cntrl, true);
> >> > - mhi_unprepare_after_power_down(mhi_cntrl);
> >> > mhi_unregister_controller(mhi_cntrl);
> >> >
> >> > /* MHI-layer reset could not be enough, always hard-reset the device */
> >> > mhi_pci_reset(mhi_cntrl);
> >> > +}
> >> > +
> >> > +void mhi_pci_reset_prepare(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >> > +{
> >> > + struct mhi_pci_device *mhi_pdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >> > + struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl = &mhi_pdev->mhi_cntrl;
> >> > +
> >> > + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "reset\n");
> >> > +
> >> > + /* Clean up MHI state */
> >> > + if (test_and_clear_bit(MHI_PCI_DEV_STARTED, &mhi_pdev->status)) {
> >> > + mhi_power_down(mhi_cntrl, false);
> >> > + mhi_unprepare_after_power_down(mhi_cntrl);
> >> > + }
> >> > +
> >> > + /* cause internal device reset */
> >> > + mhi_pci_reset(mhi_cntrl);
> >> > +
> >> > + /* Be sure device reset has been executed */
> >> > + msleep(500);
> >> > +}
> >> > +
> >> > +void mhi_pci_reset_done(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >> > +{
> >> > + struct mhi_pci_device *mhi_pdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >> > + struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl = &mhi_pdev->mhi_cntrl;
> >> > + int err;
> >> > +
> >> > + /* Restore initial known working PCI state */
> >> > + pci_load_saved_state(pdev, mhi_pdev->pci_state);
> >> > + pci_restore_state(pdev);
> >> > +
> >> > + /* Is device status available ? */
> >> > + if (!mhi_pci_is_alive(mhi_cntrl)) {
> >> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "reset failed\n");
> >> > + return;
> >> > + }
> >> >
> >> > - mhi_free_controller(mhi_cntrl);
> >> > + err = mhi_prepare_for_power_up(mhi_cntrl);
> >> > + if (err) {
> >> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to prepare MHI controller\n");
> >> > + return;
> >> > + }
> >> > +
> >> > + err = mhi_sync_power_up(mhi_cntrl);
> >> > + if (err) {
> >> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to power up MHI controller\n");
> >> > + mhi_unprepare_after_power_down(mhi_cntrl);
> >> > + return;
> >> > + }
> >> > +
> >> > + set_bit(MHI_PCI_DEV_STARTED, &mhi_pdev->status);
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > +static const struct pci_error_handlers mhi_pci_err_handler = {
> >> > + .reset_prepare = mhi_pci_reset_prepare,
> >> > + .reset_done = mhi_pci_reset_done,
> >> > +};
> >> > +
> >> > static struct pci_driver mhi_pci_driver = {
> >> > .name = "mhi-pci-generic",
> >> > .id_table = mhi_pci_id_table,
> >> > .probe = mhi_pci_probe,
> >> > - .remove = mhi_pci_remove
> >> > + .remove = mhi_pci_remove,
> >> > + .err_handler = &mhi_pci_err_handler,
> >> > };
> >> > module_pci_driver(mhi_pci_driver);
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > 2.7.4
> >> >
>
> Thanks,
> Bhaumik
> ---
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
> Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
