On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 06:00:05PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: > Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > From: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > There is really no point having an auto-start for channels. > > This is confusing for the device drivers, some have to enable the > > channels, others don't have... and waste resources (e.g. pre allocated > > buffers) that may never be used. > > > > This is really up to the MHI device(channel) driver to manage the state > > of its channels. > > > > While at it, let's also remove the auto-start option from ath11k mhi > > controller. > > > > Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx> > > [mani: clubbed ath11k change] > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Hmm, didn't we apply this already? At least I pulled the immutable > branch to my tree: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/commit/?h=ath-next&id=526740b495059ebbc0c3c086dceca1263820fa4f > > So if there's a new version of this patch (and a new commit id) the > immutable branch I pulled is not immutable anymore. This is not a new version of the patch. The commit SHA of this patch in immutable branch is ed5298c7d500abaf34ed7783969e953a1f028e5b and that is same in mhi-next as well. Now I'm funneling all patches in mhi-next to mainline through Greg, so this patch is part of the (MHI changes for v5.11) patch series. Perhaps you might be dealing with pull requests to Dave/Jakub but since the MHI patch flow is usually fairly low, Greg is happy with patch series. But since we are dealing with immutable branch I should send the pull request to Greg now. Thanks, Mani > > -- > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ > > https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
