Re: [PATCH 4/8] mhi: pci_generic: Add support for reset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Bhaumik,

On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 18:12, Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2020-11-13 06:59, Loic Poulain wrote:
> > Add support for resetting the device, reset can be triggered in case
> > of error or manually via sysfs (/sys/bus/pci/devices/*/reset).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/bus/mhi/pci_generic.c | 117
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 104 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/pci_generic.c
> > b/drivers/bus/mhi/pci_generic.c
> > index 0c07cf5..b48c382 100644
> > --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/pci_generic.c
> > +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/pci_generic.c
> > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> >   * Copyright (C) 2020 Linaro Ltd <loic.poulain@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >   */
> >
> > +#include <linux/delay.h>
> >  #include <linux/device.h>
> >  #include <linux/mhi.h>
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> > @@ -179,6 +180,16 @@ static const struct pci_device_id
> > mhi_pci_id_table[] = {
> >  };
> >  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, mhi_pci_id_table);
> >
> > +enum mhi_pci_device_status {
> > +     MHI_PCI_DEV_STARTED,
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct mhi_pci_device {
> > +     struct mhi_controller mhi_cntrl;
> > +     struct pci_saved_state *pci_state;
> > +     unsigned long status;
> > +};
> > +
> >  static int mhi_pci_read_reg(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
> >                           void __iomem *addr, u32 *out)
> >  {
> > @@ -203,6 +214,20 @@ static inline void mhi_pci_reset(struct
> > mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl)
> >       writel(1, mhi_cntrl->regs + DEV_RESET_REG);
> >  }
> >
> > +static bool mhi_pci_is_alive(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl)
> > +{
> > +     struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(mhi_cntrl->cntrl_dev);
> > +     u16 vendor = 0;
> > +
> > +     if (pci_read_config_word(pdev, PCI_VENDOR_ID, &vendor))
> > +             return false;
> > +
> > +     if (vendor == (u16) ~0 || vendor == 0)
> > +             return false;
> > +
> > +     return true;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int mhi_pci_claim(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
> >                        unsigned int bar_num, u64 dma_mask)
> >  {
> > @@ -298,16 +323,18 @@ static int mhi_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > const struct pci_device_id *id)
> >  {
> >       const struct mhi_pci_dev_info *info = (struct mhi_pci_dev_info *)
> > id->driver_data;
> >       const struct mhi_controller_config *mhi_cntrl_config;
> > +     struct mhi_pci_device *mhi_pdev;
> >       struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl;
> >       int err;
> >
> >       dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "MHI PCI device found: %s\n", info->name);
> >
> > -     mhi_cntrl = mhi_alloc_controller();
> > -     if (!mhi_cntrl)
> Not recommended.
> > +     mhi_pdev = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*mhi_pdev), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +     if (!mhi_pdev)
> >               return -ENOMEM;
> Why move away from the mhi_alloc_controller/mhi_free_controller pair we
> recommended for use?

Because now I don't allocate mhi controller separately, it's part of
the allocated mhi_pci_device that inherit from it. If necessary we
would need something like mhi_init_controller() to initialize the
field, but AFAIU everything needs to be zeroed.

Regards,
Loic



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux