Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add SDX55 GCC clock bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Manivannan Sadhasivam (2020-10-30 20:29:44)
> Hi Rob,
> 
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 02:22:25PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 01:12:29PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Add device tree bindings for global clock controller on SDX55 SoCs.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > This should carry your S-o-b too.
> > 
> 
> Ah yes!
> 
> > > ---
> > >  .../bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sdx55.yaml        |  71 +++++++++++
> > >  include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sdx55.h    | 112 ++++++++++++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 183 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sdx55.yaml
> > >  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sdx55.h
> > > 
> 
> [...]
> 
> > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sdx55.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sdx55.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..09ca45c6de73
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sdx55.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
> > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> > 
> > Dual license? 
> > 
> 
> The downstream code just lists the GPL2.0 and I'm not sure if I can make
> it as dual license. Whereas the binding we made it dual license since we

Can you check? qcom has been doing it so I suspect you should just ask.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux