Thanks for the review Stephen.
On 9/15/2020 5:43 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Taniya Das (2020-09-08 10:07:26)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
index 26139ef..fb27fcf 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
@@ -1561,3 +1571,75 @@ const struct clk_ops clk_alpha_pll_postdiv_lucid_ops = {
.set_rate = clk_alpha_pll_postdiv_fabia_set_rate,
};
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_alpha_pll_postdiv_lucid_ops);
+
+void clk_agera_pll_configure(struct clk_alpha_pll *pll, struct regmap *regmap,
+ const struct alpha_pll_config *config)
+{
+ if (config->l)
+ regmap_write(regmap, PLL_L_VAL(pll), config->l);
+
+ if (config->alpha)
+ regmap_write(regmap, PLL_ALPHA_VAL(pll), config->alpha);
+
+ if (config->user_ctl_val)
+ regmap_write(regmap, PLL_USER_CTL(pll), config->user_ctl_val);
+
+ if (config->config_ctl_val)
+ regmap_write(regmap, PLL_CONFIG_CTL(pll),
+ config->config_ctl_val);
+
+ if (config->config_ctl_hi_val)
+ regmap_write(regmap, PLL_CONFIG_CTL_U(pll),
+ config->config_ctl_hi_val);
+
+ if (config->test_ctl_val)
+ regmap_write(regmap, PLL_TEST_CTL(pll),
+ config->test_ctl_val);
+
+ if (config->test_ctl_hi_val)
+ regmap_write(regmap, PLL_TEST_CTL_U(pll),
+ config->test_ctl_hi_val);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_agera_pll_configure);
+
+static int alpha_pll_agera_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
Why not clk_alpha_pll prefix? We should prefix the other PLL functions
in here with clk_alpha_ like trion and fabia
Yes, I will update this in the next patch.
+ unsigned long prate)
+{
+ struct clk_alpha_pll *pll = to_clk_alpha_pll(hw);
+ u32 l, alpha_width = pll_alpha_width(pll);
+ unsigned long rrate;
+ u64 a;
+
+ rrate = alpha_pll_round_rate(rate, prate, &l, &a, alpha_width);
+
+ /*
+ * Due to limited number of bits for fractional rate programming, the
+ * rounded up rate could be marginally higher than the requested rate.
+ */
+ if (rrate > (rate + PLL_RATE_MARGIN) || rrate < rate) {
+ pr_err("Call set rate on the PLL with rounded rates!\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
See commit f78f29079327 ("clk: qcom: alpha-pll: Make error prints more
informative") where I tried to make this better. Can you extract this
check into a function that helps us understand the error better?
Updated to follow the same.
+
+ /* change L_VAL without having to go through the power on sequence */
+ regmap_write(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_L_VAL(pll), l);
+ regmap_write(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_ALPHA_VAL(pll), a);
+
+ /* Ensure that the write above goes through before proceeding. */
+ mb();
regmap has an mb() in it. Remove this?
Yes, will remove it.
+
+ if (clk_hw_is_enabled(hw))
+ return wait_for_pll_enable_lock(pll);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+const struct clk_ops clk_alpha_pll_agera_ops = {
+ .enable = clk_alpha_pll_enable,
+ .disable = clk_alpha_pll_disable,
+ .is_enabled = clk_alpha_pll_is_enabled,
+ .recalc_rate = alpha_pll_fabia_recalc_rate,
+ .round_rate = clk_alpha_pll_round_rate,
+ .set_rate = alpha_pll_agera_set_rate,
+};
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_alpha_pll_agera_ops);
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
--
