Quoting Mark Brown (2020-10-02 11:04:30) > On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 10:48:32AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Mark Brown (2020-10-02 09:03:24) > > > > ...and doing this in the dev_name() should help other diagnostic users > > > (like dev_printk() for example). > > > Don't thinks like dev_printk() prefix the bus name? See > > dev_driver_string()? So I agree that having the bus name is useful, but > > confused why there are testing scripts and things on top of regmap > > debugfs > > Not that I've ever noticed, eg on the console. I see things like this on my console: [ 1.684617] spmi spmi-0: PMIC arbiter version v5 (0x50000000) and 'spmi' is the bus name I'm thinking about. But I think that's because there isn't a driver attached. Nothing prints for the 0-00 device by default, so I enabled the debug print for it and I see [ 1.693280] pmic-spmi 0-00: 28: unknown v2.0 Anyway, the device name was written to follow i2c as far as I can tell. If scripts, i.e. computers, have a hard time figuring out the name of the device then fix the script?
