Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] scsi: ufshcd: Properly set the device Icc Level

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020-08-31 18:19, Bao D. Nguyen wrote:
UFS version 3.0 and later devices require Vcc and Vccq power supplies
with Vccq2 being optional. While earlier UFS version 2.0 and 2.1
devices, the Vcc and Vccq2 are required with Vccq being optional.
Check the required power supplies used by the device
and set the device's supported Icc level properly.

Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Bao D. Nguyen <nguyenb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 06e2439..fdd1d3e 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -6845,8 +6845,9 @@ static u32
ufshcd_find_max_sup_active_icc_level(struct ufs_hba *hba,
 {
 	u32 icc_level = 0;

-	if (!hba->vreg_info.vcc || !hba->vreg_info.vccq ||
-						!hba->vreg_info.vccq2) {
+	if (!hba->vreg_info.vcc ||
+		(!hba->vreg_info.vccq && hba->dev_info.wspecversion >= 0x300) ||
+		(!hba->vreg_info.vccq2 && hba->dev_info.wspecversion < 0x300)) {
 		dev_err(hba->dev,
 			"%s: Regulator capability was not set, actvIccLevel=%d",
 							__func__, icc_level);

Hello,
Thank you for the comments on this change so far.
It's been idle for some time, so I would like to ping and see if there is any other comment.

Regards,
Bao




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux