On Tue, Sep 08 2020 at 12:05, Doug Anderson wrote: > On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 2:54 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Right and that's where we want the new chip flag with the unmask if >> armed. > > OK, so we're back in Maulik's court to spin, right? I think the last > word before our tangent was at: > > http://lore.kernel.org/r/87y2m1vhkm.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > There you were leaning towards #2 ("a new function > disable_wakeup_irq_for_suspend()"). Presumably you'd now be > suggesting #1 ("Do the symmetric thing") since I've pointed out the > bunch of drivers that would need to change. Yes #1 is what we need. Thanks, tglx
