Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] Convert the intel iommu driver to the dma-iommu api

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi,

On 27/08/2020 22:36, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
On 2020-08-23 6:04 p.m., Tom Murphy wrote:
I have added a check for the sg_dma_len == 0 :
"""
  } __sgt_iter(struct scatterlist *sgl, bool dma) {
         struct sgt_iter s = { .sgp = sgl };

+       if (sgl && sg_dma_len(sgl) == 0)
+           s.sgp = NULL;

         if (s.sgp) {
             .....
"""
at location [1].
but it doens't fix the problem.

Based on my read of the code, it looks like we also need to change usage
of sgl->length... Something like the rough patch below, maybe?

This thread was brought to my attention and I initially missed this reply. Essentially I came to the same conclusion about the need to use sg_dma_len. One small correction below:

Also, Tom, do you have an updated version of the patchset to convert the
Intel IOMMU to dma-iommu available? The last one I've found doesn't
apply cleanly (I'm assuming parts of it have been merged in slightly
modified forms).

Thanks,

Logan

--

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scatterlist.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915
index b7b59328cb76..9367ac801f0c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scatterlist.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scatterlist.h
@@ -27,13 +27,19 @@ static __always_inline struct sgt_iter {
  } __sgt_iter(struct scatterlist *sgl, bool dma) {
         struct sgt_iter s = { .sgp = sgl };

+       if (sgl && !sg_dma_len(s.sgp))

I'd extend the condition to be, just to be safe:

	if (dma && sgl && !sg_dma_len(s.sgp))

+               s.sgp = NULL;
+
         if (s.sgp) {
                 s.max = s.curr = s.sgp->offset;
-               s.max += s.sgp->length;
-               if (dma)
+
+               if (dma) {
+                       s.max += sg_dma_len(s.sgp);
                         s.dma = sg_dma_address(s.sgp);
-               else
+               } else {
+                       s.max += s.sgp->length;
                         s.pfn = page_to_pfn(sg_page(s.sgp));
+               }

Otherwise has this been tested or alternatively how to test it? (How to repro the issue.)

Regards,

Tvrtko



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux