On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 03:01:25PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote: > Jordan Crouse (12): > iommu/arm-smmu: Pass io-pgtable config to implementation specific > function > iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for split pagetables > iommu/arm-smmu: Prepare for the adreno-smmu implementation > iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Add implementation for the adreno GPU SMMU > dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add compatible string for Adreno GPU SMMU > drm/msm: Add a context pointer to the submitqueue > drm/msm: Drop context arg to gpu->submit() > drm/msm: Set the global virtual address range from the IOMMU domain > drm/msm: Add support to create a local pagetable > drm/msm: Add support for private address space instances > drm/msm/a6xx: Add support for per-instance pagetables > arm: dts: qcom: sm845: Set the compatible string for the GPU SMMU > > Rob Clark (8): > drm/msm: remove dangling submitqueue references > iommu: add private interface for adreno-smmu > drm/msm/gpu: add dev_to_gpu() helper > drm/msm: set adreno_smmu as gpu's drvdata > iommu/arm-smmu: constify some helpers > arm: dts: qcom: sc7180: Set the compatible string for the GPU SMMU > iommu/arm-smmu: add a way for implementations to influence SCTLR > drm/msm: show process names in gem_describe Can the DRM parts be merged independently from the IOMMU parts or does this need to be queued together? If it needs to be together I defer the decission to Will through which tree this should go. Joerg
