Em Wed, 12 Aug 2020 10:30:36 -0600 Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 17:41:57 +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Add documentation for the properties needed by the HiSilicon > > 6421v600 driver, and by the SPMI controller used to access > > the chipset. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.yaml | 175 ++++++++++++++++++ > > .../spmi/hisilicon,hisi-spmi-controller.yaml | 54 ++++++ > > 2 files changed, 229 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.yaml > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/hisilicon,hisi-spmi-controller.yaml > > > > > My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch: > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.yaml: $id: relative path/filename doesn't match actual path or filename > expected: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.yaml# > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.example.dts:34.15-28: Warning (reg_format): /example-0/pmic@0/regulators/ldo3@16:reg: property has invalid length (4 bytes) (#address-cells == 2, #size-cells == 1) > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.example.dts:57.15-28: Warning (reg_format): /example-0/pmic@0/regulators/ldo4@17:reg: property has invalid length (4 bytes) (#address-cells == 2, #size-cells == 1) > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.example.dt.yaml: Warning (pci_device_reg): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format' > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.example.dt.yaml: Warning (pci_device_bus_num): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format' > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.example.dt.yaml: Warning (simple_bus_reg): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format' > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.example.dt.yaml: Warning (i2c_bus_reg): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format' > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.example.dt.yaml: Warning (spi_bus_reg): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format' > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.example.dts:33.27-54.15: Warning (avoid_default_addr_size): /example-0/pmic@0/regulators/ldo3@16: Relying on default #address-cells value > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.example.dts:33.27-54.15: Warning (avoid_default_addr_size): /example-0/pmic@0/regulators/ldo3@16: Relying on default #size-cells value > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.example.dts:56.27-76.15: Warning (avoid_default_addr_size): /example-0/pmic@0/regulators/ldo4@17: Relying on default #address-cells value > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.example.dts:56.27-76.15: Warning (avoid_default_addr_size): /example-0/pmic@0/regulators/ldo4@17: Relying on default #size-cells value > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.example.dt.yaml: Warning (unique_unit_address): Failed prerequisite 'avoid_default_addr_size' > /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/hisilicon,hisi-spmi-controller.example.dt.yaml: example-0: spmi@fff24000:reg:0: [0, 4294066176, 0, 4096] is too long > /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/hisilicon,hisi-spmi-controller.example.dt.yaml: spmi@fff24000: spmi-channel:0: 'number of the SPMI channel where the PMIC is connected' was expected > /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.example.dt.yaml: pmic@0: 'spmi-channel' is a required property > > > See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1343370 > > If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above > error(s), then make sure dt-schema is up to date: > > pip3 install git+https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema.git@master --upgrade > > Please check and re-submit. > Hi Rob, Fixed those at the newest version I submitted today via staging tree. At least here, dt_binding_check passes at the newest version. Regards, Mauro
