Hi,
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 2:11 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Quoting Mike Tipton (2020-02-14 18:12:32)
> > The current implementation always uses rpmh_write_async, which doesn't
> > wait for completion. That's fine for disable requests since there's no
> > immediate need for the clocks and they can be disabled in the
> > background. However, for enable requests we need to ensure the clocks
> > are actually enabled before returning to the client. Otherwise, clients
> > can end up accessing their HW before the necessary clocks are enabled,
> > which can lead to bus errors.
> >
> > Use the synchronous version of this API (rpmh_write) for enable requests
> > in the active set to ensure completion.
> >
> > Completion isn't required for sleep/wake sets, since they don't take
> > effect until after we enter sleep. All rpmh requests are automatically
> > flushed prior to entering sleep.
> >
> > Fixes: 9c7e47025a6b ("clk: qcom: clk-rpmh: Add QCOM RPMh clock driver")
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Tipton <mdtipton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
>
> Applied to clk-next but I squashed in some changes to make it easier for
> me to read.
This landed upstream as commit dad4e7fda4bd ("clk: qcom: clk-rpmh:
Wait for completion when enabling clocks") but seemed to have missed
stable. Can stable pick it up? It has a Fixes tag so presumably it
should be easy to track down where it needs to go.
Thanks!
-Doug
