Re: [PATCH v9 3/5] drm/msm/dp: add support for DP PLL driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020-08-07 13:28, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 8/7/20 1:24 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Rob Clark (2020-08-07 08:51:48)
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 8:27 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On 8/7/20 12:17 AM, Tanmay Shah wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Kconfig
index ea3c4d094d09..cc1392b29022 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Kconfig
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ config DRM_MSM_HDMI_HDCP
 config DRM_MSM_DP
      bool "Enable DP support in MSM DRM driver"
      depends on DRM_MSM
+     default y
      help
Compile in support for DP driver in msm drm driver. DP external display support is enabled through this config option. It can

Hi,

You need a very strong justification to make an optional part of a
driver
to be "default y".

My opinion is that if the driver is built, everything should be built.
This is what makes sense for distro's.  It is only the embedded case
where you want to trim down unneeded features where you might want to
disable some parts.  So 'default y' makes sense to me.

We don't set defaults for distro convenience.


Maybe use 'default DRM_MSM' so that it doesn't trigger the 'default y'
filters people have?

Most people can figure that one out.  ;)
I don't have any automated filters.

After after further reviews, I agree with Rob. Display Port is required module as of now so it makes sense to keep 'default y'.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux