On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:10 PM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 22-07-20, 11:00, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 21-07-20, 07:28, Rob Clark wrote: > > > With your ack, I can add the patch the dev_pm_opp_set_bw patch to my > > > tree and merge it via msm-next -> drm-next -> linus > > > > I wanted to send it via my tree, but its okay. Pick this patch from > > linux-next and add my Ack, I will drop it after that. > > > > a8351c12c6c7 OPP: Add and export helper to set bandwidth > > Oops, sorry for the trouble but this needs to go via my tree only :( > > I maintain two different branches, one for OPP and another one for > cpufreq. There was no dependency within the OPP branch and so I > dropped it that day and asked you to take it. > > But when I tried to send a pull request today I realised that one of > the qcom patches in the cpufreq branch is dependent on it and I need > to keep this patch in my tree. Hmm, I've already sent my pull request to Dave, dropping the patch would require force-push and sending a new PR. Which I can do if Dave prefers. OTOH I guess it isn't the end of the world if the patch is merged via two different trees. BR, -R