On 2020-07-28 13:59, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2020-07-28 00:51:02)
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
index 6d7d2169bfb2..adb71987a1e3 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
@@ -48,8 +48,6 @@ module_param(pm_save_enable, int, 0444);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(pm_save_enable,
"Save/restore state on power down: 1 = never, 2 =
self-hosted");
-/* The number of ETMv4 currently registered */
-static int etm4_count;
static struct etmv4_drvdata *etmdrvdata[NR_CPUS];
static void etm4_set_default_config(struct etmv4_config *config);
static int etm4_set_event_filters(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata,
@@ -1403,12 +1401,9 @@ static int etm4_pm_setup_cpuslocked(void)
Is this only called from __init now? If so please mark it as __init
then.
Yes, will change it.
{
int ret;
- if (etm4_count++)
- return 0;
-
ret = cpu_pm_register_notifier(&etm4_cpu_pm_nb);
if (ret)
- goto reduce_count;
+ return ret;
ret =
cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls_cpuslocked(CPUHP_AP_ARM_CORESIGHT_STARTING,
"arm/coresight4:starting",
@@ -1432,17 +1427,11 @@ static int etm4_pm_setup_cpuslocked(void)
unregister_notifier:
cpu_pm_unregister_notifier(&etm4_cpu_pm_nb);
-
-reduce_count:
- --etm4_count;
return ret;
}
static void etm4_pm_clear(void)
This is __init too?
Will change.
{
- if (--etm4_count != 0)
- return;
-
cpu_pm_unregister_notifier(&etm4_cpu_pm_nb);
cpuhp_remove_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_ARM_CORESIGHT_STARTING);
if (hp_online) {
@@ -1598,4 +1576,29 @@ static struct amba_driver etm4x_driver = {
.probe = etm4_probe,
.id_table = etm4_ids,
};
-builtin_amba_driver(etm4x_driver);
+
+static int __init etm4x_init(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ cpus_read_lock();
+ ret = etm4_pm_setup_cpuslocked();
+ cpus_read_unlock();
+
+ /* etm4_pm_setup_cpuslocked() does its own cleanup - exit on
error */
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = amba_driver_register(&etm4x_driver);
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_info("Error registering etm4x driver\n");
Use pr_err() please.
Yes indeed, will change.
+ goto err_init;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+
+err_init:
Why is this a goto?
+ etm4_pm_clear();
+ return ret;
Instead of just putting this in the if (ret) arm?
Will change.
+}
+module_init(etm4x_init);
It was device_initcall before with builtin_amba_driver(), best to not
change that.
Sure.
I will wait to see if there are any more comments on this patch and then
post a v3.
Thanks for the review Stephen.
Thanks,
Sai
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation