On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 08:00:04PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 01:00:27PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Tue 14 Jul 10:57 PDT 2020, Eric Biggers wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:43:45AM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > > > On Tue 14 Jul 10:31 PDT 2020, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tue 14 Jul 10:12 PDT 2020, Eric Biggers wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:59:44AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:43 AM Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:35:12AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:15 AM Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:16:04AM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eric, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Add the vendor-specific registers and clock for Qualcomm ICE (Inline > > > > > > > > > > > > Crypto Engine) to the device tree node for the UFS host controller on > > > > > > > > > > > > sdm845, so that the ufs-qcom driver will be able to use inline crypto. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to see an Acked-by for this patch before I merge it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andy, Bjorn, or Rob: can you give Acked-by? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DTS changes should go in via the QCom tree. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, the DTS patch can't be applied without the driver patches since then the > > > > > > > > driver would misinterpret the ICE registers as the dev_ref_clk_ctrl registers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That sounds broken, but there's no context here for me to comment > > > > > > > further. DTS changes should work with old/stable kernels. I'd suggest > > > > > > > you get a review from Bjorn on the driver first. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The "breaking" change is that the dev_ref_clk_ctrl registers are now identified > > > > > > by name instead of assumed to be index 1. > > > > > > > > > > > > A reviewer had complained about the device-mapper bindings of this driver before > > > > > > (https://lkml.kernel.org/r/158334171487.7173.5606223900174949177@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx). > > > > > > Changing to identifying the registers by name seemed like an improvement. > > > > > > > > > > > > If needed I can add a hole at index 1 to make the DTS changes work with > > > > > > old/stable kernels too, but I didn't know that is a requirement. (Normally for > > > > > > Linux kernel development, kernel-internal refactoring is always allowed > > > > > > upstream.) If I do this, would this hack have to be carried forever, or would > > > > > > we be able to fix it up eventually? Is there any deprecation period for DTS, or > > > > > > do the latest DTS have to work with a 20 year old kernel? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The problem here is that DT binding refactoring is not kernel-internal. > > > > > It's two different projects living in the same git. > > > > > > > > > > There's a wish from various people that we make sure that new DTS > > > > > continues to work with existing kernels. This is a nice in theory > > > > > there's a lot of examples where we simply couldn't anticipate how future > > > > > bindings would look. A particular example is that this prohibits most > > > > > advancement in power management. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But afaict what you describe above would make a new kernel failing to > > > > > operate with the old DTS and that we have agreed to avoid. > > > > > So I think the appropriate way to deal with this is to request the reg > > > > > byname to detect the new binding and if that fails then assume that > > > > > index 1 is dev_ref_clk_ctrl. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I took another look at the git history and I can't find a single dts - > > > > either upstream or in any downstream tree - that specifies that second > > > > reg. > > > > > > > > So per my argument below, if you could include a patch that just removes > > > > the "dev_ref_clk_ctrl_mem" reference from the binding and driver I would > > > > be happy to r-b that and ack this patch. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Bjorn > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are cases where we just decide not to be backwards compatible, but > > > > > it's pretty rare. As for deprecation, I think 1-2 LTS releases is > > > > > sufficient, at that time scale it doesn't make sense to sit with an old > > > > > DTB anyways (given the current pace of advancements in the kernel). > > > > > > > > > > > Great, I'll remove the driver support for "dev_ref_clk_ctrl" then. However, > > > that doesn't solve the problem of the new DTS breaking old drivers, since old > > > drivers assume that reg[1] is dev_ref_clk_ctrl. > > > > > > This patch makes the DTS look like: > > > > > > reg = <0 0x01d84000 0 0x2500>, > > > <0 0x01d90000 0 0x8000>; > > > reg-names = "std", "ice"; > > > > > > The "ice" registers are new and are accessed by name instead of by index. > > > > > > But these also happen to be in reg[1]. Old drivers will see that reg[1] is > > > present and assume it is dev_ref_clk_ctrl. > > > > > > To work around this, I could leave a blank reg[1] entry: > > > > > > reg = <0 0x01d84000 0 0x2500>, > > > <0 0 0 0>, > > > <0 0x01d90000 0 0x8000>; > > > reg-names = "std", "dev_ref_clk_ctrl", "ice"; > > > > > > Do I need to do that? > > > > > > > No, let's not complicate it without good reason. SDM845 has hw_ver.major > > == 3, so we're not taking the else-path in ufs_qcom_init(). So I should > > be able to just merge this patch for 5.9 through the qcom tree after > > all (your code handles that it's not there and the existing code doesn't > > care). > > > > > > The two platforms that I can find that has UFS controller of > > hw_ver.major == 1 is APQ8084 and MSM8994, so I simply didn't look at an > > old enough downstream tree (msm-3.10) to find anyone specifying reg[1]. > > The reg specified is however coming from the TLMM (pinctrl-msm) hardware > > block, so it should not be directly remapped in the UFS driver... > > > > But regardless, that has not been seen in an upstream dts and per your > > patch 2 we would add that reg by name when that happens. > > There's recent activity on upstreaming more of the MSM8994 support, so > > perhaps then it's best to leave this snippet in the driver for now. > > > > > > Summary: Martin merges (merged?) patch 1, 2, 4 and 5 in the scsi tree, > > I'll merge this patch as is in the qcom tree and we'll just leave the > > dev_ref_clk handling as is for now then. > > > > Okay, great. So an old DTS with the new driver isn't a problem because no DTS > has ever declared dev_ref_clk_ctrl. And a new DTS with an old driver is a less > important case, and also not really a problem here since breakage would only > occur if we added the ICE registers to an older SoC that has hw_ver.major == 1. > > Maybe you'd like to provide your Acked-by on patches 2 and 5? > > My instinct is always to remove code that has never been used. But sure, if you > think the dev_ref_clk_ctrl code might be used soon, we can keep it for now. > Ping?
