Re: [PATCH v4 05/20] backlight: improve backlight_device documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/3/20, 2:46 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> Improve the documentation for backlight_device and
> adapt it to kernel-doc style.
>
> The updated documentation is more strict on how locking is used.
> With the update neither update_lock nor ops_lock may be used
> outside the backlight core.
> This restriction was introduced to keep the locking simple
> by keeping it in the core.
> It was verified that this documents the current state by renaming
> update_lock => bl_update_lock and ops_lock => bl_ops_lock.
> The rename did not reveal any uses outside the backlight core.
> The rename is NOT part of this patch.
>
> v3:
>   - Update changelog to explain locking details (Daniel)
>
> v2:
>   - Add short intro to all fields (Daniel)
>   - Updated description of update_lock (Daniel)
>
> Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
 > Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@xxxxxxxxx>

It looks good!
Reviewed-by: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@xxxxxxxxx>

For the rebase, if you don't know which branch of maintainer's git can be used,
linux-next tree [1] is useful. The linux-next git collects all next branches from 
other maintainers' git every day.

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/

Thank you.

Best regards,
Jingoo Han

> ---
>  include/linux/backlight.h | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
.....




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux