Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] pinctrl: qcom: Add msmgpio irqchip flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 2:32 AM Maulik Shah <mkshah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Add irqchip specific flags for msmgpio irqchip to mask non wakeirqs
> during suspend and mask before setting irq type.
>
> Masking before changing type should make sure any spurious interrupt
> is not detected during this operation.
>
> Fixes: e35a6ae0eb3a ("pinctrl/msm: Setup GPIO chip in hierarchy")
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
> index 2419023..b909ffe 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
> @@ -1143,6 +1143,8 @@ static int msm_gpio_init(struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl)
>         pctrl->irq_chip.irq_release_resources = msm_gpio_irq_relres;
>         pctrl->irq_chip.irq_set_affinity = msm_gpio_irq_set_affinity;
>         pctrl->irq_chip.irq_set_vcpu_affinity = msm_gpio_irq_set_vcpu_affinity;
> +       pctrl->irq_chip.flags = IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND

I haven't tested it, but with my suggestion in patch #4 to use
irq_suspend and irq_resume, I presume adding IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND
is no longer needed?


> +                               | IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED;

IIUC adding "IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED" is unrelated to the rest of this
series, right?

-Doug



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux