On Wed 24 Jun 15:32 PDT 2020, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Konrad Dybcio (2020-06-24 08:09:18) > > I should also note that for quite some time a hack [1] > > has been needed on some platforms for the RPMCC to register. > > > > This includes 8992/94, 8956/76 and possibly many more. > > > > With that commit, RPMCC registers fine. > > > > What happens if that patch isn't applied? Does the system crash? Because > I'd rather not merge a patch in clk tree that causes the system to fail > to boot. The state machine code in the SMD implementation finds the RPM channel, but it's in a state that indicates that the remote side is still closing/cleaning up from when the bootloader had it open. The result is that we never probe the RPM driver. I merged a patch that would cause the logic here to be a little bit more aggressive/optimistic, but that had to be reverted because it prevented the modem from coming up cleanly after a crash. And I unfortunately still don't have any hardware that manifest this problem that I can debug this on myself. But I think it's fine to merge the rpmcc patch (which I see you did). Thanks, Bjorn
