On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 07:00:05PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:55:36AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 06:44:17PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > Wait, so *some* of the series should go together but not other bits? > > > But you want them split up for some reason? > > > Yes, this will almost certainly be the case, even if not for this patch. > > I brought this up earlier (https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11604623/#23428709). > > I'm not really reading any of this stuff for the series as a whole, as > far as I could tell I'd reviewed all my bits and was hoping whatever > random platform stuff needs sorting out was going to be sorted out so I > stopped getting copied on revisions :( Sorry this caused you extra work, I only fully realized this when the series was basically ready to land :( Avoiding unnecessary revision spam is another good reason to not combine technically unrelated patches in a single series. If I notice similar series in the future I'll try to bring it up early. > > For the QSPI patch you could argue to just take it through QCOM since the SPI > > patch of this series goes through this tree, up to you, I just want to make > > sure everybody is on the same page. > > If there are some part of this that don't have a connection with the > rest of the series and should be applied separately please split them > out and send them separately so it's clear what's going on. Rajendra, IIUC you have to re-spin this series anyway, please split it up in self-contained chunks.
