Hi,
On 6/19/2020 1:53 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Maulik Shah (2020-06-18 06:14:11)
Use __fill_rpmh_msg API during rpmh_write(). This allows to
remove duplication of code in error checking, copying commands
and setting message state.
Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah<mkshah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c | 12 +++---------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c
index f2b5b46c..a0a0b97 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c
@@ -181,8 +181,6 @@ static int __rpmh_write(const struct device *dev, enum rpmh_state state,
struct cache_req *req;
int i;
- rpm_msg->msg.state = state;
-
/* Cache the request in our store and link the payload */
for (i = 0; i < rpm_msg->msg.num_cmds; i++) {
req = cache_rpm_request(ctrlr, state, &rpm_msg->msg.cmds[i]);
@@ -190,8 +188,6 @@ static int __rpmh_write(const struct device *dev, enum rpmh_state state,
return PTR_ERR(req);
}
- rpm_msg->msg.state = state;
-
if (state == RPMH_ACTIVE_ONLY_STATE) {
WARN_ON(irqs_disabled());
ret = rpmh_rsc_send_data(ctrlr_to_drv(ctrlr), &rpm_msg->msg);
Were these two hunks just nonsense assignments to rpm_msg->msg.state?
yes, using __fill_rpmh_msg() and DEFINE_RPMH_MSG_ONSTACK takes care of
setting this.
Thanks,
Maulik
@@ -268,11 +264,9 @@ int rpmh_write(const struct device *dev, enum rpmh_state state,
DEFINE_RPMH_MSG_ONSTACK(dev, state, &compl, rpm_msg);
int ret;
- if (!cmd || !n || n > MAX_RPMH_PAYLOAD)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- memcpy(rpm_msg.cmd, cmd, n * sizeof(*cmd));
- rpm_msg.msg.num_cmds = n;
+ ret = __fill_rpmh_msg(&rpm_msg, state, cmd, n);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
This part makes sense and is discussed in the commit text.
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
