On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 2:42 PM Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It would have been nice to be able to do this only for the particular
> board with this design, however this change of removing gpio28 from the
> pinctrl SoC file means we end up with one less wakeup capable gpio for
> the entire SoC.
Yeah but what about only removing it for this board in the driver then?
> @@ -1122,7 +1122,7 @@ static const struct msm_pingroup sc7180_groups[] = {
> static const struct msm_gpio_wakeirq_map sc7180_pdc_map[] = {
> {0, 40}, {3, 50}, {4, 42}, {5, 70}, {6, 41}, {9, 35},
> {10, 80}, {11, 51}, {16, 20}, {21, 55}, {22, 90}, {23, 21},
> - {24, 61}, {26, 52}, {28, 36}, {30, 100}, {31, 33}, {32, 81},
> + {24, 61}, {26, 52}, {30, 100}, {31, 33}, {32, 81},
> {33, 62}, {34, 43}, {36, 91}, {37, 53}, {38, 63}, {39, 72},
> {41, 101}, {42, 7}, {43, 34}, {45, 73}, {47, 82}, {49, 17},
> {52, 109}, {53, 102}, {55, 92}, {56, 56}, {57, 57}, {58, 83},
Make a copy of this tuple-array and in sc7180_pinctrl_probe()
set sc7180_pinctrl.wakeirq_map and .nwakeirq_map to something
board specific like that:
if (of_machine_is_compatible("my,board")) {
sc7180_pinctrl..wakeirq_map = ... ;
}
Yours,
Linus Walleij
