On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 12:55 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2020-06-16 07:13, John Stultz wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig > > index b510f67dfa49..714893535dd2 100644 > > --- a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig > > @@ -381,6 +381,7 @@ config SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU > > config ARM_SMMU > > tristate "ARM Ltd. System MMU (SMMU) Support" > > depends on (ARM64 || ARM || (COMPILE_TEST && !GENERIC_ATOMIC64)) && > > MMU > > + depends on QCOM_SCM || !QCOM_SCM #if QCOM_SCM=m this can't be =y > > This looks a bit ugly. Could you explain why we need this at the SMMU > level? I'd have expected the dependency to flow the other way around... Yea, so the arm-smmu-qcom.c file calls directly into the qcom-scm code via qcom_scm_qsmmu500_wait_safe_toggle() https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-qcom.c?h=v5.8-rc1#n44 So if ARM_SMMU=y and QCOM_SCM=m we get: drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-qcom.o: In function `qcom_smmu500_reset': arm-smmu-qcom.c:(.text+0xb4): undefined reference to `qcom_scm_qsmmu500_wait_safe_toggle' Do you have a suggestion for an alternative approach? thanks -john
