Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] Documentation: dynamic-debug: Add description of level bitmask

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 13:16 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> What is wrong with the existing control of dynamic
> debug messages that you want to add another type of arbitrary grouping
> to it? 

There is no existing grouping mechanism.

Many drivers and some subsystems used an internal one
before dynamic debug.

$ git grep "MODULE_PARM.*\bdebug\b"|wc -l
501

This is an attempt to unify those homebrew mechanisms.

Stanimir attempted to add one for his driver via a
driver specific standardized format substring for level.

> And who defines that grouping?

Individual driver authors

> Will it be driver/subsystem/arch/author specific?  Or kernel-wide?

driver specific

> This feels like it could easily get out of hand really quickly.

Likely not.  A question might be how useful all these
old debugging printks are today and if it's reasonable
to just delete them.

> Why not just use tracepoints if you really want to be fine-grained?

Weight and lack of class/group capability





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux