Quoting Sivaprakash Murugesan (2020-06-02 03:47:20)
>
> On 6/2/2020 1:06 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Sivaprakash Murugesan (2020-06-01 05:41:15)
> >> On 5/28/2020 7:29 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >>> Quoting Sivaprakash Murugesan (2020-05-27 05:24:51)
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/apss-ipq6018.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/apss-ipq6018.c
> >>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>> index 0000000..004f7e1
> >>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/apss-ipq6018.c
> >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
> >>>> + P_XO,
> >>>> + P_APSS_PLL_EARLY,
> >>>> +};
> >>>> +
> >>>> +static const struct clk_parent_data parents_apcs_alias0_clk_src[] = {
> >>>> + { .fw_name = "xo" },
> >>>> + { .fw_name = "pll" },
> >>> This pll clk is not described in the binding. Please add it there.
> >> Sorry I did not get this, this PLL is not directly defined in this
> >> driver and it comes
> >>
> >> from dts. do you still want to describe it in binding?
> >>
> > Yes, there should be a clock-names property for "pll" and a clocks
> > property in the binding document. I didn't see that.
>
> These are defined in
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/27/658and
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/27/659
>
> it has been defined as part of mailbox binding, since this driver does
>
> not have a dts node and it is child of apcs mailbox driver.
>
Ah alright. Sounds good.
