On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 12:03:44PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi John, Bjorn, > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 01:34:45PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:34 PM <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu 27 Feb 18:57 PST 2020, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > > > > > Rob, Will, we're reaching the point where upstream has enough > > > functionality that this is becoming a critical issue for us. > > > > > > E.g. Lenovo Yoga C630 is lacking this and a single dts patch to boot > > > mainline with display, GPU, WiFi and audio working and the story is > > > similar on several devboards. > > > > > > As previously described, the only thing I want is the stream mapping > > > related to the display controller in place, either with the CB with > > > translation disabled or possibly with a way to specify the framebuffer > > > region (although this turns out to mess things up in the display > > > driver...) > > > > > > I did pick this up again recently and concluded that by omitting the > > > streams for the USB controllers causes an instability issue seen on one > > > of the controller to disappear. So I would prefer if we somehow could > > > have a mechanism to only pick the display streams and the context > > > allocation for this. > > > > > > > > > Can you please share some pointers/insights/wishes for how we can > > > conclude on this subject? > > > > Ping? I just wanted to follow up on this discussion as this small > > series is crucial for booting mainline on the Dragonboard 845c > > devboard. It would be really valuable to be able to get some solution > > upstream so we can test mainline w/o adding additional patches. > > Sorry, it's been insanely busy recently and I haven't had a chance to think > about this on top of everything else. We're also carrying a hack in Android > for you :) > > > The rest of the db845c series has been moving forward smoothly, but > > this set seems to be very stuck with no visible progress since Dec. > > > > Are there any pointers for what folks would prefer to see? > > I've had a chat with Robin about this. Originally, I was hoping that > people would all work together towards an idyllic future where firmware > would be able to describe arbitrary pre-existing mappings for devices, > irrespective of the IOMMU through which they master and Linux could > inherit this configuration. However, that hasn't materialised (there was > supposed to be an IORT update, but I don't know what happened to that) > and, in actual fact, the problem that you have on db845 is /far/ more > restricted than the general problem. It doesn't sound to me like implementing platform-specific workarounds is a good long-term solution (especially since, according to Bjorn, they aren't as trivial to implement as it sounds). And we already have all the infrastructure in place to implement what you describe, so I don't see why we shouldn't do that. This patchset uses standard device tree bindings that were designed for exactly this kind of use-case. So at least for device-tree based boot firmware can already describe these pre-existing mappings. If something standard materializes for ACPI eventually I'm sure we can find ways to integrate that into whatever we come up with now for DT. I think between Bjorn, John, Laurentiu and myself there's pretty broad consensus (correct me if I'm wrong, guys) that solving this via reserved memory regions is a good solution that works. So I think what's really missing is feedback on whether the changes proposed here or Laurentiu's updated proposal[0] are acceptable, and if not, what the preference is for getting something equivalent upstream. Just to highlight: the IOMMU framework already provides infrastructure to create direct mappings (via iommu_get_resv_regions(), called from iommu_create_device_direct_mappings()). I have patches that make use of this on Tegra210 and earlier where a non-ARM SMMU is used and where the IOMMU driver enables translations (and doesn't fault by default) only at device attachment time. That works perfectly using reserved-memory regions. Perhaps that infrastructure could be extended to cover the kinds of early mappings that we're discussing here. On the other hand it might be a bit premature at this point because the ARM SMMU is the only device that currently needs this, as far as I can tell. Thierry [0]: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-tegra/list/?series=164853 > Could you please try hacking something along the following lines and see > how you get on? You may need my for-joerg/arm-smmu/updates branch for > all the pieces: > > 1. Use the ->cfg_probe() callback to reserve the SMR/S2CRs you need > "pinning" and configure for bypass. > > 2. Use the ->def_domain_type() callback to return IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY > for the display controller > > I /think/ that's sufficient, but note that it differs from the current > approach because we don't end up reserving a CB -- bypass is configured > in the S2CR instead. Some invalidation might therefore be needed in > ->cfg_probe() after unhooking the CB. > > Thanks, and please yell if you run into problems with this approach. > > Will
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
