Re: [PATCH 01/10] clk: qcom: clk-alpha-pll: remove unused/incorrect PLL_CAL_VAL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/26/20 7:21 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Jonathan Marek (2020-05-24 14:06:02)
0x44 isn't a register offset, it is the value that goes into CAL_L_VAL.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@xxxxxxxx>
---

Any fixes tag?


This doesn't fix anything (its unused as the commit message says), does that still qualify for a fixes tag?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux