On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 11:35:08AM +0800, Zijun Hu wrote:
> Controller ID info got by VSC EDL_PATCH_GETVER is very
> important, so improve its log level from DEBUG to INFO.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <zijuhu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c
> index 3ea866d..49e5aeb 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c
> @@ -74,10 +74,10 @@ int qca_read_soc_version(struct hci_dev *hdev, u32 *soc_version,
>
> ver = (struct qca_btsoc_version *)(edl->data);
>
> - BT_DBG("%s: Product:0x%08x", hdev->name, le32_to_cpu(ver->product_id));
> - BT_DBG("%s: Patch :0x%08x", hdev->name, le16_to_cpu(ver->patch_ver));
> - BT_DBG("%s: ROM :0x%08x", hdev->name, le16_to_cpu(ver->rom_ver));
> - BT_DBG("%s: SOC :0x%08x", hdev->name, le32_to_cpu(ver->soc_id));
> + bt_dev_info(hdev, "QCA Product:0x%08x", le32_to_cpu(ver->product_id));
> + bt_dev_info(hdev, "QCA Patch :0x%08x", le16_to_cpu(ver->patch_ver));
> + bt_dev_info(hdev, "QCA ROM :0x%08x", le16_to_cpu(ver->rom_ver));
> + bt_dev_info(hdev, "QCA SOC :0x%08x", le32_to_cpu(ver->soc_id));
nit: Now that these messages become more visible you could consider making the
order a bit more consistent/hierarchical. Not sure what is the product ID vs.
the SoC ID (product is a variant of the SoC?). IMO it would make sense to
start with HW information, going from more generic to more specific, then do
the same for firmware.
SoC ID
Product ID // assuming this is a variant of the SoC
ROM version
Patch version // assuming this is a patch of the ROM firmware (?)
Sorry if I got any of the concepts wrong, from the names they are not entirely
clear to me.
In any case it's just a suggestion, feel free to ignore.
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
