Hi Lukasz, On 11/05/2020 13:18, Lukasz Luba wrote: > Hi all, > > This patch set introduces support for devices in the Energy Model (EM) > framework. It will unify the power model for thermal subsystem. It will > make simpler to add support for new devices willing to use more > advanced features (like Intelligent Power Allocation). Now it should > require less knowledge and effort for driver developer to add e.g. > GPU driver with simple energy model. A more sophisticated energy model > in the thermal framework is also possible, driver needs to provide > a dedicated callback function. More information can be found in the > updated documentation file. > > First 7 patches are refactoring Energy Model framework to add support > of other devices that CPUs. They change: > - naming convention from 'capacity' to 'performance' state, > - API arguments adding device pointer and not rely only on cpumask, > - change naming when 'cpu' was used, now it's a 'device' > - internal structure to maintain registered devices > - update users to the new API > Patch 8 updates OPP framework helper function to be more generic, not > CPU specific. > Patches 9-14 change devfreq cooling, dropping part of old power model and > adding registration with Energy Model via exported GPL function. > The last path is a simple change for Panfrost GPU driver. > > The patch set is based on linux-next tag next-20200508. Do you think it is possible to respin against linux-pm next ? I wanted to try the series but I'm getting non trivial conflicts with the devfreq_cooling changes -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
