On Tue 19 May 21:59 PDT 2020, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:41:15PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > Ok, that's a decision you are going to have to push upward on, as we > > > really can't take this without a working, open, userspace. > > > > Uh wut. > > > > So the merge criteria for drivers/accel (atm still drivers/misc but I > > thought that was interim until more drivers showed up) isn't actually > > "totally-not-a-gpu accel driver without open source userspace". > > > > Instead it's "totally-not-a-gpu accel driver without open source > > userspace" _and_ you have to be best buddies with Greg. Or at least > > not be on the naughty company list. Since for habanalabs all you > > wanted is a few test cases to exercise the ioctls. Not the entire > > userspace. > > Habanalabs now has their full library opensourced that their tools use > directly, so that's not an argument anymore. > > My primary point here is the copyright owner of this code, because of > that, I'm not going to objet to allowing this to be merged without open > userspace code. > So because it's copyright Linux Foundation you are going to accept it without user space, after all? Regards, Bjorn
