Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: thermal: tsens: Add 0C (zeorC) interrupt support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 3:58 PM <manafm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2020-05-05 17:39, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> > Hi Manaf,
> >
> > Typo: fix zeorC in subject line.
> Done
> >
> > Please rebase this patch[1] on top of my patch merging tsens-common.c
> > and tsens.c.
> >
> > [1]
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/e30e2ba6fa5c007983afd4d7d4e0311c0b57917a.1588183879.git.amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx/
> Done
> >
> > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 4:42 PM Manaf Meethalavalappu Pallikunhi
> > <manafm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> TSENS IP v2.6+ adds 0C interrupt support. It triggers set
> >> interrupt when aggregated minimum temperature of all TSENS falls
> >> below 0C preset threshold and triggers reset interrupt when aggregate
> >> minimum temperature of all TSENS crosses above reset threshold.
> >> Add support for this interrupt in the driver.
> >>
> >> It adds another sensor to the of-thermal along with all individual
> >> TSENS. It enables to add any mitigation for 0C interrupt.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Manaf Meethalavalappu Pallikunhi
> >> <manafm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c | 72
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>  drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v2.c     |  7 +++
> >>  drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c        | 51 ++++++++++++++++++--
> >>  drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h        | 11 +++++
> >>  4 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c
> >> b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c
> >> index 172545366636..44e7edeb9a90 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c
> >> @@ -198,7 +198,8 @@ static void tsens_set_interrupt_v1(struct
> >> tsens_priv *priv, u32 hw_id,
> >>                 index = LOW_INT_CLEAR_0 + hw_id;
> >>                 break;
> >>         case CRITICAL:
> >> -               /* No critical interrupts before v2 */
> >> +       case ZEROC:
> >> +               /* No critical and 0c interrupts before v2 */
> >>                 return;
> >>         }
> >>         regmap_field_write(priv->rf[index], enable ? 0 : 1);
> >> @@ -229,6 +230,9 @@ static void tsens_set_interrupt_v2(struct
> >> tsens_priv *priv, u32 hw_id,
> >>                 index_mask  = CRIT_INT_MASK_0 + hw_id;
> >>                 index_clear = CRIT_INT_CLEAR_0 + hw_id;
> >>                 break;
> >> +       case ZEROC:
> >> +               /* Nothing to handle for 0c interrupt */
> >> +               return;
> >>         }
> >>
> >>         if (enable) {
> >> @@ -360,6 +364,34 @@ static inline u32 masked_irq(u32 hw_id, u32 mask,
> >> enum tsens_ver ver)
> >>         return 0;
> >>  }
> >>
> >> +/**
> >> + * tsens_0c_irq_thread - Threaded interrupt handler for 0c interrupt
> >
> > Let's use zeroc instead of 0c in the function and variable names and
> > comments everywhere. Easier to grep and better consistency too.
> Done
> >
> >> + * @irq: irq number
> >> + * @data: tsens controller private data
> >> + *
> >> + * Whenever interrupt triggers notify thermal framework using
> >> + * thermal_zone_device_update() to update cold temperature
> >> mitigation.
> >
> > How is this mitigation updated?
> Updated comment section
> >> + *
> >> + * Return: IRQ_HANDLED
> >> + */
> >> +irqreturn_t tsens_0c_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
> >> +{
> >> +       struct tsens_priv *priv = data;
> >> +       struct tsens_sensor *s = &priv->sensor[priv->num_sensors];
> >> +       int temp, ret;
> >> +
> >> +       ret = regmap_field_read(priv->rf[TSENS_0C_STATUS], &temp);


> >> +       if (ret)
> >> +               return ret;
> >> +
> >> +       dev_dbg(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: 0c interrupt is %s\n",
> >> +               s->hw_id, __func__, temp ? "triggered" : "cleared");
> >
> > So triggered is printed for non-zero (including negative) values?
> This zeroc hardware generates each interrupt when any of the TSENS that
> it monitors goes below 5C or above 10c. These thresholds are not
> configurable. Hence we don't expect this to be changed from kernel side.
> So this sensor (status register) will read 0 or 1.  1 means soc
> temperature is in cold condition and 0 means it is in normal
> temperature.

All this information belongs in the function description and the part
about the status register returning 0 (for temp > 10) and 1 (for temp
<=5) belongs in the patch description too. Please add it to v3.

What happens at 7 degrees? Will the HW continue returning 1 due to
some hysteresis?

I'll review v2 in a bit.

> >
> >> +
> >> +       thermal_zone_device_update(s->tzd, THERMAL_EVENT_UNSPECIFIED);
> >> +
> >> +       return IRQ_HANDLED;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>  /**
> >>   * tsens_critical_irq_thread() - Threaded handler for critical
> >> interrupts
> >>   * @irq: irq number
> >> @@ -566,6 +598,20 @@ void tsens_disable_irq(struct tsens_priv *priv)
> >>         regmap_field_write(priv->rf[INT_EN], 0);
> >>  }
> >>
> >> +int tsens_get_0c_int_status(const struct tsens_sensor *s, int *temp)
> >> +{
> >> +       struct tsens_priv *priv = s->priv;
> >> +       int last_temp = 0, ret;
> >> +
> >> +       ret = regmap_field_read(priv->rf[TSENS_0C_STATUS],
> >> &last_temp);
> >> +       if (ret)
> >> +               return ret;
> >> +
> >> +       *temp = last_temp;
> >> +
> >> +       return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>  int get_temp_tsens_valid(const struct tsens_sensor *s, int *temp)
> >>  {
> >>         struct tsens_priv *priv = s->priv;
> >> @@ -833,6 +879,30 @@ int __init init_common(struct tsens_priv *priv)
> >>                 regmap_field_write(priv->rf[CC_MON_MASK], 1);
> >>         }
> >>
> >> +       if (tsens_version(priv) > VER_1_X &&  ver_minor > 5) {
> >> +               /* 0C interrupt is present only on v2.6+ */
> >> +               priv->rf[TSENS_0C_INT_EN] =
> >> devm_regmap_field_alloc(dev,
> >> +                                               priv->srot_map,
> >> +
> >> priv->fields[TSENS_0C_INT_EN]);
> >> +               if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[TSENS_0C_INT_EN])) {
> >> +                       ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[TSENS_0C_INT_EN]);
> >> +                       goto err_put_device;
> >> +               }
> >> +
> >> +               /* Check whether 0C interrupt is enabled or not */
> >> +               regmap_field_read(priv->rf[TSENS_0C_INT_EN],
> >> &enabled);
> >> +               if (enabled) {
> >> +                       priv->feat->zero_c_int = 1;
> >
> > This should be done at the beginning of the block where you check our
> > version is > 2.6 since the flag only says whether the feature is
> > present.
> Done
> >
> >> +                       priv->rf[TSENS_0C_STATUS] =
> >> devm_regmap_field_alloc(dev,
> >> +                                               priv->tm_map,
> >> +
> >> priv->fields[TSENS_0C_STATUS]);
> >> +                       if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[TSENS_0C_STATUS])) {
> >> +                               ret =
> >> PTR_ERR(priv->rf[TSENS_0C_STATUS]);
> >> +                               goto err_put_device;
> >> +                       }
> >> +               }
> >> +       }
> >> +
> >>         spin_lock_init(&priv->ul_lock);
> >>         tsens_enable_irq(priv);
> >>         tsens_debug_init(op);
> >> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v2.c
> >> b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v2.c
> >> index b293ed32174b..ce80d82c7255 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v2.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v2.c
> >> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> >>  /* ----- SROT ------ */
> >>  #define SROT_HW_VER_OFF        0x0000
> >>  #define SROT_CTRL_OFF          0x0004
> >> +#define SROT_OC_CTRL_OFF       0x0018
> >>
> >>  /* ----- TM ------ */
> >>  #define TM_INT_EN_OFF                  0x0004
> >> @@ -23,6 +24,7 @@
> >>  #define TM_Sn_UPPER_LOWER_THRESHOLD_OFF 0x0020
> >>  #define TM_Sn_CRITICAL_THRESHOLD_OFF   0x0060
> >>  #define TM_Sn_STATUS_OFF               0x00a0
> >> +#define TM_0C_INT_STATUS_OFF           0x00e0
> >>  #define TM_TRDY_OFF                    0x00e4
> >>  #define TM_WDOG_LOG_OFF                0x013c
> >>
> >> @@ -45,6 +47,7 @@ static const struct reg_field
> >> tsens_v2_regfields[MAX_REGFIELDS] = {
> >>         /* CTRL_OFF */
> >>         [TSENS_EN]     = REG_FIELD(SROT_CTRL_OFF,    0,  0),
> >>         [TSENS_SW_RST] = REG_FIELD(SROT_CTRL_OFF,    1,  1),
> >> +       [TSENS_0C_INT_EN] = REG_FIELD(SROT_OC_CTRL_OFF, 0,  0),
> >>
> >>         /* ----- TM ------ */
> >>         /* INTERRUPT ENABLE */
> >> @@ -86,6 +89,9 @@ static const struct reg_field
> >> tsens_v2_regfields[MAX_REGFIELDS] = {
> >>         REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR16(CRITICAL_STATUS, TM_Sn_STATUS_OFF,
> >> 19,  19),
> >>         REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR16(MAX_STATUS,      TM_Sn_STATUS_OFF,
> >> 20,  20),
> >>
> >> +       /* 0C INETRRUPT STATUS */
> >
> > Typo: Interrupt
> >
> >> +       [TSENS_0C_STATUS] = REG_FIELD(TM_0C_INT_STATUS_OFF, 0, 0),
> >> +
> >>         /* TRDY: 1=ready, 0=in progress */
> >>         [TRDY] = REG_FIELD(TM_TRDY_OFF, 0, 0),
> >>  };
> >> @@ -93,6 +99,7 @@ static const struct reg_field
> >> tsens_v2_regfields[MAX_REGFIELDS] = {
> >>  static const struct tsens_ops ops_generic_v2 = {
> >>         .init           = init_common,
> >>         .get_temp       = get_temp_tsens_valid,
> >> +       .get_0c_status  = tsens_get_0c_int_status,
> >>  };
> >>
> >>  struct tsens_plat_data data_tsens_v2 = {
> >> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
> >> b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
> >> index 2f77d235cf73..e60870c53383 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
> >> @@ -14,6 +14,17 @@
> >>  #include <linux/thermal.h>
> >>  #include "tsens.h"
> >>
> >> +static int tsens_0c_get_temp(void *data, int *temp)
> >> +{
> >> +       struct tsens_sensor *s = data;
> >> +       struct tsens_priv *priv = s->priv;
> >> +
> >> +       if (priv->ops->get_0c_status)
> >> +               return priv->ops->get_0c_status(s, temp);
> >> +
> >> +       return -ENOTSUPP;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>  static int tsens_get_temp(void *data, int *temp)
> >>  {
> >>         struct tsens_sensor *s = data;
> >> @@ -85,6 +96,10 @@ static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops
> >> tsens_of_ops = {
> >>         .set_trips = tsens_set_trips,
> >>  };
> >>
> >> +static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops tsens_0c_of_ops = {
> >> +       .get_temp = tsens_0c_get_temp,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >>  static int tsens_register_irq(struct tsens_priv *priv, char *irqname,
> >>                               irq_handler_t thread_fn)
> >>  {
> >> @@ -142,6 +157,21 @@ static int tsens_register(struct tsens_priv
> >> *priv)
> >>                 ret = tsens_register_irq(priv, "critical",
> >>                                          tsens_critical_irq_thread);
> >>
> >> +       if (priv->feat->zero_c_int) {
> >> +               priv->sensor[priv->num_sensors].priv = priv;
> >> +               tzd = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(priv->dev,
> >> +
> >> priv->sensor[priv->num_sensors].hw_id,
> >> +
> >> &priv->sensor[priv->num_sensors],
> >> +                                       &tsens_0c_of_ops);
> >> +               if (IS_ERR(tzd)) {
> >> +                       ret = 0;
> >> +                       return ret;
> >> +               }
> >> +
> >> +               priv->sensor[priv->num_sensors].tzd = tzd;
> >
> > Why can't this happen in the previous loop, but increase the loop to
> > <= num_sensors? It is duplicated code.
> I think if i change  default loop logic to <= num_sensors, it will break
> other legacy targets, right ?
> My idea is to guard all changes related to zeroc under zeroc related
> feature flag.
> Again, since we cannot configure any threshold from kernel side, there
> is no set_trip ops for this sensor, so we need to call register function
> differently in compared to regular sensor
> >
> >> +               ret = tsens_register_irq(priv, "zeroc",
> >> tsens_0c_irq_thread);
> >> +       }
> >> +
> >>         return ret;
> >>  }
> >>
> >> @@ -178,11 +208,22 @@ static int tsens_probe(struct platform_device
> >> *pdev)
> >>                 return -EINVAL;
> >>         }
> >>
> >> -       priv = devm_kzalloc(dev,
> >> -                            struct_size(priv, sensor, num_sensors),
> >> -                            GFP_KERNEL);
> >> -       if (!priv)
> >> -               return -ENOMEM;
> >> +       /* Check for 0c interrupt is enabled or not */
> >> +       if (platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "zeroc") > 0) {
> >> +               priv = devm_kzalloc(dev,
> >> +                               struct_size(priv, sensor, num_sensors
> >> + 1),
> >> +                               GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > Instead of doing this, simply do the following,
> >
> > if (platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "zeroc") > 0) {
> >         num_sensors++;
> >
> > The kzalloc will just work then, no?
> I just changed logic in v2.  Basically this zeroc feature is an
> optional. There is a chance that we don't need to enable in software
> even though hardware support is present.
> So I used another variable to check whether feature is enabled or not by
> checking DT interrupt configuration.

I've looked briefly at v2 and I don't like the way we play around with
num_sensors by special casing zeroc_en to allocate extra memory and
then revert it. It feels very convoluted. I'll address the rest of the
comments on v2.

> >
> >> +               if (!priv)
> >> +                       return -ENOMEM;
> >> +               /* Use Max sensor index as 0c sensor hw_id */
> >> +               priv->sensor[num_sensors].hw_id =
> >> data->feat->max_sensors;
> >> +       } else {
> >> +               priv = devm_kzalloc(dev,
> >> +                               struct_size(priv, sensor,
> >> num_sensors),
> >> +                               GFP_KERNEL);
> >> +               if (!priv)
> >> +                       return -ENOMEM;
> >> +       }
> >>
> >>         priv->dev = dev;
> >>         priv->num_sensors = num_sensors;
> >> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h
> >> b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h
> >> index 502acf0e6828..5b53a0352b4d 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h
> >> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ enum tsens_irq_type {
> >>         LOWER,
> >>         UPPER,
> >>         CRITICAL,
> >> +       ZEROC,
> >>  };
> >>
> >>  /**
> >> @@ -64,6 +65,7 @@ struct tsens_sensor {
> >>   * @suspend: Function to suspend the tsens device
> >>   * @resume: Function to resume the tsens device
> >>   * @get_trend: Function to get the thermal/temp trend
> >> + * @get_0c_status: Function to get the 0c interrupt status
> >>   */
> >>  struct tsens_ops {
> >>         /* mandatory callbacks */
> >> @@ -76,6 +78,7 @@ struct tsens_ops {
> >>         int (*suspend)(struct tsens_priv *priv);
> >>         int (*resume)(struct tsens_priv *priv);
> >>         int (*get_trend)(struct tsens_sensor *s, enum thermal_trend
> >> *trend);
> >> +       int (*get_0c_status)(const struct tsens_sensor *s, int *temp);
> >>  };
> >>
> >>  #define REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR11(_name, _offset, _startbit,
> >> _stopbit) \
> >> @@ -161,6 +164,8 @@ enum regfield_ids {
> >>         TSENS_SW_RST,
> >>         SENSOR_EN,
> >>         CODE_OR_TEMP,
> >> +       /* 0C CTRL OFFSET */
> >> +       TSENS_0C_INT_EN,
> >>
> >>         /* ----- TM ------ */
> >>         /* TRDY */
> >> @@ -485,6 +490,8 @@ enum regfield_ids {
> >>         MAX_STATUS_14,
> >>         MAX_STATUS_15,
> >>
> >> +       TSENS_0C_STATUS,        /* 0C INTERRUPT status */
> >> +
> >>         /* Keep last */
> >>         MAX_REGFIELDS
> >>  };
> >> @@ -497,6 +504,7 @@ enum regfield_ids {
> >>   * @srot_split: does the IP neatly splits the register space into
> >> SROT and TM,
> >>   *              with SROT only being available to secure boot
> >> firmware?
> >>   * @has_watchdog: does this IP support watchdog functionality?
> >> + * @zero_c_int: does this IP support 0C interrupt ?
> >>   * @max_sensors: maximum sensors supported by this version of the IP
> >>   */
> >>  struct tsens_features {
> >> @@ -505,6 +513,7 @@ struct tsens_features {
> >>         unsigned int adc:1;
> >>         unsigned int srot_split:1;
> >>         unsigned int has_watchdog:1;
> >> +       unsigned int zero_c_int:1;
> >
> > zeroc_interrupt
> Done
> >
> >>         unsigned int max_sensors;
> >>  };
> >>
> >> @@ -580,11 +589,13 @@ void compute_intercept_slope(struct tsens_priv
> >> *priv, u32 *pt1, u32 *pt2, u32 mo
> >>  int init_common(struct tsens_priv *priv);
> >>  int get_temp_tsens_valid(const struct tsens_sensor *s, int *temp);
> >>  int get_temp_common(const struct tsens_sensor *s, int *temp);
> >> +int tsens_get_0c_int_status(const struct tsens_sensor *s, int *temp);
> >>  int tsens_enable_irq(struct tsens_priv *priv);
> >>  void tsens_disable_irq(struct tsens_priv *priv);
> >>  int tsens_set_trips(void *_sensor, int low, int high);
> >>  irqreturn_t tsens_irq_thread(int irq, void *data);
> >>  irqreturn_t tsens_critical_irq_thread(int irq, void *data);
> >> +irqreturn_t tsens_0c_irq_thread(int irq, void *data);
> >>
> >>  /* TSENS target */
> >>  extern struct tsens_plat_data data_8960;
> >> --
> >> 2.26.2



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux