Re: [PATCH] bus: mhi: core: Use current ee in intvec handler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/15/2020 8:58 PM, bbhatt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 2020-05-14 19:17, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
The intvec handler stores the caches ee in a local variable for use in
processing the intvec.  It should instead use the current ee which is
read at the beginning of the intvec incase that the intvec is related to
an ee change.  Otherwise, the handler might make the wrong decision
based on an incorrect ee.

Fixes: 3000f85b8f47 (bus: mhi: core: Add support for basic PM operations)
Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c
index 7272a5a..0a41fe5 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c
@@ -386,8 +386,8 @@ irqreturn_t mhi_intvec_threaded_handler(int
irq_number, void *dev)
     write_lock_irq(&mhi_cntrl->pm_lock);
     if (MHI_REG_ACCESS_VALID(mhi_cntrl->pm_state)) {
         state = mhi_get_mhi_state(mhi_cntrl);
-        ee = mhi_cntrl->ee;
         mhi_cntrl->ee = mhi_get_exec_env(mhi_cntrl);
+        ee = mhi_cntrl->ee;
     }

     if (state == MHI_STATE_SYS_ERR) {
Hi Jeff,

Let's hold off on this change for now please as we have some good set of
bug fixes and improvements coming in very soon. They're only pending post
to LKML.

Does that series of changes address the same issue this patch does, and are they going to be posted soon (ie this week)?

--
Jeffrey Hugo
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux