Quoting Doug Anderson (2020-04-24 10:13:43) > Hi, > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 10:11 AM Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 9:54 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > readl returns a u32, and BITS_PER_LONG is different on 32-bit vs. 64-bit > > > architectures. Let's make the type we stash the readl into a u32 and > > > then loop over the bits set in that type instead of potentially looping > > > over more bits than we will ever need to. > > > > > > Cc: Maulik Shah <mkshah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c | 4 ++-- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Oh, I suppose one nit is s/less/fewer/ in the subject. "bits" are > discrete / countable, not continuous / uncountable. > Ok that's good.